masha freeman — CS2 Stats

76561198317386014[U:1:357120286]

1,957Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,248Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10885 of 52734 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,011Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,248
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,752 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmasha freemanFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,248 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning59
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression9.1
Utility6.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch6.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.9
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time572ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25111444%-0.00
mirageS2315865%0.01
infernoB147750%-0.02
nukeC125742%0.01
ancientA127558%0.01
cacheA85363%0.00
anubisS54180%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

195Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
71.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6662%0.9714.9
Dust22446%0.8312.0
Ancient2335%0.7511.8
Anubis2167%1.0012.8
Vertigo1547%0.9612.5
Inferno1164%1.0614.6
Nuke812%0.7912.8
Overpass10%0.538.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
570msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
10.44HE damage / grenade
12.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7165% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0122%30 Aug
dust28–130.0220%30 Aug
dust213–5-0.0115%30 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0419%30 Aug
cache13–80.0610%30 Aug
cache13–90.0320%30 Aug
ancient13–30.1016%30 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0320%30 Aug
dust29–130.0117%29 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1120%29 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0122%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0132%28 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0824%28 Aug
anubis16–120.037%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0315%28 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0620%28 Aug
dust216–140.028%27 Aug
mirage13–80.089%27 Aug
cache16–120.0118%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0316%27 Aug
nuke8–130.0015%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0615%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0321%24 Aug
dust28–130.0634%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0511%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0518%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0116%17 Aug
dust26–130.0716%16 Aug
mirage13–30.1215%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0321%16 Aug
dust29–130.0721%16 Aug
inferno10–130.0314%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.039%15 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0215%15 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0316%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0620%9 Aug
dust213–90.0721%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0515%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0628%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0224%9 Aug
inferno13–80.0120%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0125%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0825%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0227%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0612%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0323%8 Aug
dust213–10-0.0217%5 Aug
inferno6–1-0.0229%4 Aug
mirage13–00.1426%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0417%4 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0221%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0714%4 Aug
nuke13–160.0215%4 Aug
dust213–90.0524%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0423%29 Jul
nuke5–130.0218%29 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0111%28 Jul
cache13–60.0319%28 Jul
dust213–30.0114%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0631%24 Jul
ancient13–6-0.018%24 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0026%23 Jul
mirage8–130.0319%23 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0215%23 Jul
dust23–13-0.0719%23 Jul
cache4–13-0.0517%23 Jul
cache13–9-0.0126%23 Jul
nuke6–130.0332%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0121%23 Jul
nuke13–20.1328%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.1238%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0315%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0720%23 Jul
dust216–13-0.0322%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0217%22 Jul
dust213–90.0523%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0231%22 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0647%22 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0614%22 Jul
ancient5–130.0126%4 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0222%3 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0116%1 Jul
nuke10–130.0818%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.1019%29 Jun
mirage13–20.0529%27 Jun
inferno16–120.0122%27 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0013%20 Jun
mirage10–130.0120%20 Jun
dust28–13-0.0317%20 Jun
nuke13–90.0023%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0122%10 Jun
overpass2–9-0.1021%8 Jun
dust213–100.0322%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0214%8 Jun
ancient13–100.0113%31 May
dust213–70.0542%31 May
dust29–13-0.0535%31 May
mirage13–70.0724%29 May
ancient13–100.0925%23 May
ancient13–160.0926%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →