cpnga — CS2 Stats

76561198314108680[U:1:353842952]

4,039Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating11,523Blue band · top ~46.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31077 of 44637 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,146 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning56

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression6.7

Utility4.1

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning5.6

Utility4.1

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time585ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 29cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	29	18–11	62%	0.04
dust2	C	21	9–12	43%	0.01
nuke	B	17	9–8	53%	0.01
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
cache	D	10	3–7	30%	0.03
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.10
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,303Matches

51%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

74.3ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	425	54%	0.98	14.5
Dust2	239	49%	0.95	14.7
Ancient	162	49%	1.02	15.9
Nuke	133	46%	1.01	15.7
Anubis	107	53%	0.98	14.9
Inferno	70	50%	1.04	16.1
Cache	31	48%	0.91	13.7
Vertigo	28	54%	1.18	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.8%Spray accuracy

77.9%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

591msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

50.7%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

5.92HE damage / grenade

6.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4588 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.1921% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–9	-0.02	17%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.10	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	21%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	19%	19 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	24%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	38%	18 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	27%	16 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	24%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	26%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	27%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.04	16%	3 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	19%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	20%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.00	32%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	22%	23 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	31%	23 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.11	24%	22 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.14	27%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.02	28%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.04	34%	22 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.13	21%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.10	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.18	29%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.11	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	25%	21 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.10	27%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	36%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.16	32%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	33%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.09	34%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.20	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.07	14%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.09	22%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.15	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	39%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	21%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.00	34%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.02	28%	12 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.08	33%	10 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.07	30%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	22%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.19	25%	9 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	14%	8 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	18%	29 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	15%	27 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.02	27%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	11%	27 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	12%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	24%	25 Jun →
dust2	0–6	0.05	36%	24 Jun →
mirage	0–6	-0.07	29%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.01	20%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	20%	23 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.02	17%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	19%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.03	27%	19 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	13%	19 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	32%	19 Jun →
ancient	16–14	0.04	11%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.07	20%	18 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.08	24%	17 Jun →
ancient	4–13	0.00	14%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.09	26%	17 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	29%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	10%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	19%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	23%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	20%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	22%	9 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	8 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.03	17%	8 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.07	18%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	27%	7 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	15%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.04	18%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	24%	6 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	11%	5 Jun →
nuke	4–4	-0.02	40%	5 Jun →
nuke	8–4	-0.11	22%	4 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	16%	4 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	55%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.02	24%	1 Jun →
anubis	16–12	-0.01	8%	1 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.08	43%	30 May →
dust2	13–10	0.15	24%	30 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	18%	29 May →
ancient	13–3	0.02	64%	28 May →
nuke	6–13	0.03	27%	27 May →
mirage	0–2	-0.02	0%	27 May →
nuke	3–13	0.02	43%	27 May →
dust2	2–13	0.02	35%	23 May →