SimpelBliksem

SimpelBliksem — CS2 Stats

76561198309853219[U:1:349587491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

160Tracked matches36%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating4,116Grey band · top ~82.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9629 of 12641 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSimpelBliksemPREMIER4,116 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning45
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD28666Last 10028%Win rateTLLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression6.9
Utility3.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning4.5
Utility3.3
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.2

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time587ms−142ms
first ⅓ avg 729ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−13.7%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — sanctum 9–6
131Biggest win — anubis
3Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 6ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2662023%-0.01
infernoD2151624%0.01
mirageD1551033%0.01
ancientD92722%0.00
cacheD82625%-0.00
anubisB63350%0.00
vertigoC52340%0.03
nuke3030%-0.05
train31233%0.06
overpass2020%0.01
warden110100%0.02
sanctum110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
588msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
7.06HE damage / grenade
3.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8195% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4454 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8873% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0211%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0518%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.127%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0513%24 Aug
cache9–130.0716%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0115%23 Aug
dust26–130.0431%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0719%22 Aug
inferno5–130.007%22 Aug
cache2–13-0.0112%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0314%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0516%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0110%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0213%19 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0110%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0215%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0318%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0014%16 Aug
anubis13–70.0921%16 Aug
anubis13–10.039%16 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0114%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.015%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0717%16 Aug
dust211–130.0111%16 Aug
mirage16–140.0216%16 Aug
dust28–130.0215%16 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0417%16 Aug
inferno2–13-0.044%15 Aug
cache1–13-0.065%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0512%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0215%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0113%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0112%10 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0721%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.1032%9 Aug
ancient1–130.0417%18 Jul
cache11–130.0015%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.028%18 Jul
inferno13–70.1020%18 Jul
inferno13–60.0616%18 Jul
cache13–80.0417%7 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0014%25 Jun
cache1–13-0.0616%20 Jun
ancient15–150.0917%20 Jun
train8–130.0630%20 Jun
train13–10.0819%20 Jun
dust21–13-0.0215%19 Jun
train5–130.0511%18 Jun
dust21–13-0.0819%18 Jun
dust22–13-0.0315%16 Jun
warden13–110.0213%16 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0212%15 Jun
dust213–60.0616%15 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0521%15 Jun
nuke3–13-0.066%15 Jun
mirage13–30.0613%15 Jun
inferno10–130.0213%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0221%14 Jun
dust29–130.0321%14 Jun
dust27–130.0218%14 Jun
dust213–40.0623%14 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0115%13 Jun
dust20–13-0.0328%13 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0123%13 Jun
inferno9–130.1123%13 Jun
ancient2–13-0.098%13 Jun
overpass11–130.0632%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0522%13 Jun
mirage16–140.0419%13 Jun
inferno9–70.1248%13 Jun
sanctum9–60.1543%13 Jun
vertigo6–90.0222%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0017%13 Jun
dust212–120.0926%13 Jun
dust213–60.0315%12 Jun
dust26–130.0011%12 Jun
dust25–13-0.0714%11 Jun
dust24–130.0234%11 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0538%10 Jun
inferno5–130.0516%10 Jun
mirage3–130.0520%10 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0911%9 Jun
inferno12–120.0220%9 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0044%7 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0222%6 Jun
cache13–30.0121%6 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0425%6 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0048%6 Jun
vertigo1–130.0432%6 Jun
inferno0–130.0150%6 Jun
inferno8–130.0020%6 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0531%6 Jun
dust24–13-0.077%5 Jun
vertigo13–60.1424%5 Jun
dust213–7-0.0339%5 Jun
cache4–13-0.0019%5 Jun
vertigo13–80.0048%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0537%31 May
inferno2–13-0.0126%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →