Maimai

Maimai — CS2 Stats

76561198309801802[U:1:349536074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,147Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,031Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2193 of 23444 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,736 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaimaiFACEITLevel 10 · 2,736 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,031 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.7
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time530ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — cache 7–4
131Biggest win — dust2
10Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28101836%0.01
dust2A2113862%0.02
ancientA1811761%0.02
anubisD1741324%0.01
cacheS108280%0.04
nuke330100%0.06
inferno31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,177Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
81.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage67150%1.1016.0
Dust247052%1.1516.8
Ancient34455%1.2116.9
Anubis20543%1.1016.5
Inferno19047%1.0816.3
Nuke7850%1.0515.4
Overpass3656%1.1816.5
Vertigo3432%1.0715.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
519msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7139% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0425%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0124%27 Aug
cache2–13-0.0527%24 Aug
anubis4–13-0.026%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0223%22 Aug
cache13–100.0223%22 Aug
nuke13–20.0510%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0513%15 Aug
cache13–30.0219%11 Aug
anubis11–130.0320%11 Aug
ancient13–70.1015%11 Aug
cache13–100.1217%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0418%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0415%9 Aug
anubis13–100.0617%7 Aug
anubis7–130.0215%3 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0313%3 Aug
anubis6–130.0314%3 Aug
cache13–9-0.0116%2 Aug
mirage16–19-0.0120%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0215%1 Aug
dust213–50.0516%28 Jul
anubis3–13-0.078%28 Jul
ancient12–160.0214%27 Jul
mirage13–30.0328%27 Jul
dust210–130.0218%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0415%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0918%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0122%25 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0121%24 Jul
dust213–90.0020%23 Jul
ancient9–130.0222%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0019%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0325%22 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0211%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0312%21 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0323%21 Jul
ancient9–130.0115%20 Jul
ancient11–130.0314%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0113%20 Jul
ancient1–13-0.088%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0619%19 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0314%19 Jul
ancient13–100.029%19 Jul
anubis13–60.0419%19 Jul
dust29–130.0927%19 Jul
dust213–50.0118%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0414%17 Jul
anubis13–50.1519%17 Jul
dust213–90.0620%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0720%16 Jul
ancient13–70.0733%15 Jul
mirage15–150.0626%14 Jul
mirage9–130.0112%13 Jul
anubis15–150.0014%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0119%13 Jul
dust25–130.0215%13 Jul
dust29–13-0.0018%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.0412%12 Jul
anubis8–13-0.079%12 Jul
ancient13–40.0413%11 Jul
dust213–9-0.0213%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0220%11 Jul
ancient3–130.0228%10 Jul
dust213–40.1726%10 Jul
dust213–110.0827%10 Jul
dust213–1-0.0120%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0313%10 Jul
dust213–70.0823%10 Jul
ancient13–70.035%10 Jul
mirage13–40.0320%10 Jul
cache13–80.0122%10 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0119%10 Jul
mirage13–80.1133%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0719%9 Jul
mirage4–130.0313%9 Jul
cache7–40.2726%9 Jul
dust213–60.0926%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0213%8 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0523%29 Jun
ancient13–110.0414%29 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0514%25 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0221%23 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0740%23 Jun
dust213–80.0016%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0115%22 Jun
ancient13–70.0213%21 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0313%8 Jun
mirage13–80.1117%8 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0216%17 May
cache10–13-0.0119%16 May
mirage13–100.0115%13 May
inferno11–13-0.0116%13 May
mirage7–13-0.0619%12 May
ancient19–170.0013%12 May
dust213–11-0.0114%10 May
inferno13–70.0013%8 May
cache13–90.088%8 May
nuke13–50.1231%8 May
ancient13–8-0.0222%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →