Energy_240

Energy_240 — CS2 Stats

76561198308903377[U:1:348637649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

690Tracked matches69%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,094Blue band · top ~33.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35684 of 56589 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEnergy_240FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,094 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning72
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression8.6
Utility4.4
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning7.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time655ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–6
133Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS32211166%0.04
dust2B24131154%0.02
ancientB21101148%-0.00
nukeA85363%0.00
anubisS75271%0.03
infernoD72529%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
48%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
74.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
57%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1553%1.0616.7
Dust21369%1.9818.0
Vertigo944%1.2819.2
Ancient825%0.8513.4
Inferno650%0.8515.2
Anubis560%1.1716.8
Nuke10%0.7518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
649msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
58.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
5.81HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5976% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.059%14 Jun
ancient10–130.0010%2 Jun
dust213–100.0418%19 May
anubis13–110.0321%15 May
dust211–13-0.0618%15 May
nuke13–10-0.0410%14 May
dust210–130.0216%14 May
ancient13–100.015%14 May
mirage13–30.068%14 May
mirage16–140.0112%12 May
mirage13–60.0626%11 May
anubis13–70.0611%6 May
mirage13–80.1015%5 May
dust213–40.1421%5 May
dust213–50.0414%5 May
ancient13–16-0.0523%5 May
mirage15–150.009%5 May
dust211–13-0.0127%4 May
mirage13–60.1517%4 May
ancient13–110.0415%4 May
mirage9–13-0.007%4 May
mirage13–70.0512%2 May
anubis13–110.0720%2 May
inferno14–160.0926%2 May
mirage13–60.0616%2 May
anubis11–130.0320%2 May
dust213–11-0.0113%2 May
dust216–130.0433%2 May
mirage8–130.0214%2 May
anubis13–30.0018%2 May
mirage10–130.0215%1 May
dust213–70.1021%1 May
ancient6–13-0.0912%30 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0623%30 Apr
mirage15–150.0010%30 Apr
dust213–40.079%30 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0319%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0013%29 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0515%29 Apr
mirage13–100.0120%28 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0410%27 Mar
anubis13–90.0220%18 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0613%18 Mar
dust213–80.0127%17 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0321%1 Mar
ancient5–13-0.039%16 Feb
dust27–13-0.0811%16 Feb
mirage13–11-0.049%16 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0612%14 Feb
mirage5–130.0228%14 Feb
mirage13–60.0714%9 Nov
mirage16–13-0.0412%27 Sept
mirage6–130.0118%27 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0017%27 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0215%25 Sept
mirage6–00.075%24 Sept
mirage8–130.108%22 Sept
ancient13–40.0314%21 Sept
dust210–13-0.0315%21 Sept
ancient13–160.0419%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0519%16 Sept
dust210–130.0123%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0511%16 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0019%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0110%15 Sept
ancient16–140.0323%15 Sept
dust29–130.0527%15 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0020%14 Sept
mirage13–90.0113%14 Sept
nuke16–120.0110%12 Sept
dust210–130.0318%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0520%12 Sept
dust213–100.0711%11 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0320%10 Sept
mirage13–60.0923%10 Sept
vertigo9–20.1215%10 Sept
dust211–130.0724%9 Sept
mirage13–50.0521%9 Sept
ancient16–130.048%9 Sept
nuke13–100.0214%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0122%9 Sept
dust213–50.1221%9 Sept
ancient6–130.0214%7 Sept
dust216–130.0416%7 Sept
mirage13–80.1016%7 Sept
mirage13–16-0.024%6 Sept
nuke13–70.0413%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0710%6 Sept
mirage13–40.0721%6 Sept
dust23–13-0.0317%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0123%6 Sept
nuke15–150.0412%4 Sept
ancient13–50.0123%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0319%4 Sept
mirage4–130.0112%3 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0519%3 Sept
dust210–13-0.0525%2 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0017%2 Sept
dust216–120.0319%2 Sept
mirage13–40.1013%2 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →