purge — CS2 Stats

CA76561198305424869[U:1:345159141]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,902Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,240Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5641 of 53511 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning56

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression8.2

Utility6.3

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.6

Utility6.3

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time620ms+19ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L5Current streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	55	27–28	49%	0.02
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.01
ancient	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
dust2	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
nuke	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01
cache	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

343Matches

57%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

80.8ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	103	62%	1.26	17.5
Ancient	71	55%	1.00	15.1
Inferno	58	52%	1.09	16.4
Anubis	40	68%	1.14	16.2
Dust2	39	56%	0.92	14.6
Nuke	20	35%	1.00	14.8
Overpass	6	67%	1.21	14.0
Cache	3	33%	0.76	13.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

86.2%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

614msReaction time

23.0%T opening success

58.5%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

8.75HE damage / grenade

7.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.0463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.00	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	21%	28 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	10%	28 Aug →
mirage	2–7	-0.11	0%	19 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	12%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	23%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	16%	17 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	18%	17 Aug →
ancient	0–9	-0.08	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	0–5	-0.00	0%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	18%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.10	16%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	16%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.02	21%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	28%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	24%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.10	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	25%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.04	28%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.04	23%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	26%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	27%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	3–5	0.00	0%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.04	30%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	2–8	-0.05	22%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.08	16%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	12%	31 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.02	28%	28 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	29%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	20%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	31%	18 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–2	-0.03	33%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.00	12%	17 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	29%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	24%	16 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	11%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	12%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.20	19%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–2	-0.01	28%	11 Jul →
mirage	19–15	0.01	21%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	32%	10 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	5%	9 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.01	33%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	23%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.16	25%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	14%	1 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	28%	1 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	28%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	22%	1 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	22%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.08	13%	1 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	31%	30 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.02	21%	29 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.06	20%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	24%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	26%	11 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	20%	3 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.01	32%	3 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	0%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	2 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	37%	31 May →
anubis	10–2	0.04	32%	31 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	18%	23 May →
ancient	13–4	0.04	22%	23 May →
inferno	5–13	0.05	21%	23 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	14%	23 May →
mirage	13–5	0.09	14%	23 May →
mirage	13–4	0.03	28%	22 May →
mirage	13–6	0.05	10%	22 May →
mirage	11–13	0.02	27%	21 May →
mirage	5–13	0.02	17%	21 May →
ancient	11–13	0.01	26%	20 May →
anubis	13–3	0.02	15%	18 May →
mirage	13–4	0.06	15%	18 May →