Eddie Hubble — CS2 Stats

76561198302963022[U:1:342697294]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,620Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,178Purple band · top ~19.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#28177 of 54212 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,163 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning60

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateLLWWTTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression9.1

Utility6.0

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning6.0

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time621ms−50ms

first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–7

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 28nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	16–12	57%	-0.01
dust2	A	21	12–9	57%	0.01
ancient	C	11	4–7	36%	0.03
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.03
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

173Matches

50%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

74.5ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	50	62%	0.99	14.8
Dust2	39	46%	1.12	15.7
Ancient	24	54%	1.00	13.8
Overpass	16	38%	0.95	13.5
Inferno	15	47%	0.82	12.9
Nuke	11	45%	0.92	14.9
Anubis	7	29%	0.81	13.6
Train	5	20%	0.93	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

87.8%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

618msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

56.5%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

11.24HE damage / grenade

9.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.7034% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.05	19%	29 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	27%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	13%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	25%	28 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.01	31%	28 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.00	12%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	20%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	25%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	17%	22 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.08	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.09	22%	21 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	16%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	29%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.02	28%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.07	19%	20 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	17%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	18%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	34%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	33%	18 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.00	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.09	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	9%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	24%	17 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	21%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.08	29%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	12%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.13	22%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.09	16%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.07	27%	16 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	18%	16 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	36%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	20%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	11%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.03	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–2	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	21%	15 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	26%	9 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.04	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	32%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	24%	1 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	35%	31 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.05	9%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.06	15%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.11	17%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	20%	27 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	0%	25 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	19%	24 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	0.10	24%	19 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	0.00	41%	19 Jul →
debris	9–6	0.07	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	9%	5 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.02	22%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	32%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	27%	21 Jun →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	10%	19 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	27%	31 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	17%	31 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	19%	31 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	20%	31 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	18%	31 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	14%	30 May →
dust2	13–3	0.00	28%	30 May →
mirage	15–15	0.02	23%	27 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	26%	25 May →
cache	13–11	-0.01	25%	25 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	20%	25 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	14%	25 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	24%	25 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	24%	25 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.10	24%	25 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	27%	24 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	24%	24 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	10%	24 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	18%	23 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	19%	23 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.09	11%	23 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	18%	21 May →
ancient	13–8	0.04	15%	21 May →
dust2	16–13	-0.03	18%	17 May →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	24%	17 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	22%	17 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	41%	17 May →
inferno	13–4	0.01	23%	17 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	12%	16 May →