CHAOS — CS2 Stats

76561198299675168[U:1:339409440]✓ No bans

1,497Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating8,034Light Blue band · top ~64.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37866 of 50975 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCHAOSFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER8,034 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning42
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression4.0
Utility5.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time685ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 685ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–8
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2191243%-0.02
dust2C2081240%-0.01
anubisC1981142%0.02
nukeA138562%0.02
infernoC104640%-0.02
mirageB84450%0.00
overpassS54180%0.00
cache31233%-0.05
debris1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

130Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3165%0.9914.5
Anubis2650%0.8713.0
Mirage1656%1.1315.2
Nuke1464%1.0214.4
Dust2933%0.9214.0
Cache838%0.9813.8
Inferno650%1.4210.7
Vertigo520%0.619.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
675msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
12.50HE damage / grenade
11.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.2966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0417%30 Aug
inferno16–140.0116%30 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0810%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0221%29 Aug
dust24–130.0429%29 Aug
dust212–16-0.0430%22 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0711%15 Aug
dust213–90.0018%9 Aug
ancient13–100.0312%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0417%8 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0219%3 Aug
anubis11–130.1222%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0719%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.0917%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0211%25 Jul
dust25–13-0.047%25 Jul
ancient13–70.0212%25 Jul
inferno3–13-0.039%25 Jul
nuke11–130.0526%25 Jul
cache13–6-0.0211%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0117%18 Jul
ancient13–100.0121%18 Jul
dust27–130.0121%18 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0618%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0111%18 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0221%18 Jul
anubis13–80.0012%16 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0513%16 Jul
nuke13–70.014%15 Jul
dust213–110.1224%13 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0810%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.0112%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0314%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.118%12 Jul
anubis13–80.0423%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0818%12 Jul
anubis14–160.0416%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0925%12 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0028%11 Jul
cache14–16-0.0316%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0725%11 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0217%11 Jul
debris2–9-0.0950%11 Jul
nuke7–130.0014%27 Jun
anubis13–2-0.0021%27 Jun
overpass9–130.0214%27 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0318%27 Jun
anubis13–90.0311%27 Jun
ancient10–13-0.067%27 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0210%27 Jun
overpass13–4-0.017%27 Jun
anubis13–60.049%27 Jun
dust213–5-0.0214%27 Jun
overpass13–110.009%27 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0126%20 Jun
nuke13–60.0217%20 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0320%20 Jun
dust213–40.0315%20 Jun
dust22–9-0.0938%20 Jun
dust213–80.0318%20 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0421%20 Jun
anubis6–130.026%20 Jun
nuke13–70.0128%20 Jun
overpass8–40.035%13 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0312%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0123%30 May
mirage9–13-0.0311%30 May
nuke13–30.0835%30 May
inferno15–150.0215%30 May
anubis7–13-0.026%30 May
ancient13–2-0.027%30 May
ancient13–7-0.0711%30 May
anubis11–13-0.0510%30 May
anubis7–13-0.0813%30 May
mirage13–60.0714%25 May
dust211–130.0419%25 May
nuke5–13-0.0518%24 May
anubis8–130.0716%24 May
mirage14–160.0119%23 May
dust210–13-0.039%21 May
dust213–10-0.094%21 May
anubis13–70.0122%21 May
ancient9–13-0.0015%21 May
inferno2–9-0.256%21 May
dust211–13-0.031%16 May
ancient8–13-0.0611%16 May
dust29–130.0123%16 May
inferno9–50.1220%13 May
inferno6–9-0.0513%13 May
ancient16–13-0.0111%13 May
dust28–13-0.0025%12 May
dust213–80.0717%9 May
nuke10–13-0.029%9 May
ancient7–13-0.038%9 May
nuke13–70.0817%9 May
mirage6–130.0515%7 May
mirage13–9-0.1218%5 May
inferno10–13-0.028%5 May
anubis13–100.0315%5 May
anubis13–80.1621%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →