xo — CS2 Stats

76561198299411863[U:1:339146135]

839Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54388Last 10054%Win rateLLLWTWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression8.8
Utility5.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time618ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–8
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.03
cacheA24141058%0.05
dust2B1991047%0.04
nukeS107370%0.04
vertigoB63350%0.06
infernoD62433%0.02
anubis42250%0.04
ancient220100%0.04
boulder1010%-0.09
train1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

76Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
78.2ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3047%1.1416.3
Inferno1856%1.0916.7
Nuke1275%1.2113.9
Ancient757%1.2016.6
Dust2729%0.7812.4
Train250%0.9814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
625msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
55.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
13.42HE damage / grenade
6.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2553% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–130.0627%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0515%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0414%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0619%15 Aug
cache12–120.0113%14 Aug
dust213–8-0.036%12 Aug
dust213–70.0426%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0111%11 Aug
nuke9–130.0316%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0527%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0332%7 Aug
vertigo13–50.1828%2 Aug
vertigo10–130.0114%1 Aug
vertigo6–130.0913%1 Aug
nuke8–00.0712%27 Jul
mirage13–100.2019%27 Jul
anubis10–130.0313%27 Jul
dust212–120.0218%20 Jul
cache11–130.0035%19 Jul
nuke13–40.0733%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0625%12 Jul
boulder7–10-0.0913%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0027%9 Jul
cache13–110.1224%8 Jul
inferno13–50.0738%6 Jul
mirage13–50.0918%6 Jul
nuke13–100.0724%5 Jul
nuke13–60.0323%5 Jul
inferno13–80.0518%5 Jul
cache7–130.1037%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0414%4 Jul
cache4–130.0821%4 Jul
cache13–100.0320%1 Jul
cache13–70.0320%1 Jul
mirage13–80.1018%27 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0416%24 Jun
dust23–13-0.0511%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0214%22 Jun
dust210–130.0618%22 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0215%22 Jun
nuke13–60.0418%21 Jun
cache13–40.1210%21 Jun
inferno3–130.0544%21 Jun
mirage13–30.0426%21 Jun
cache8–130.0414%21 Jun
mirage13–70.1022%19 Jun
cache12–120.1123%18 Jun
mirage10–130.0018%18 Jun
cache13–90.0621%18 Jun
cache13–40.0723%16 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0110%16 Jun
mirage12–120.1216%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.057%11 Jun
dust213–60.0715%10 Jun
dust27–130.0129%9 Jun
dust213–60.035%8 Jun
mirage12–120.0218%8 Jun
dust213–50.075%7 Jun
dust213–80.2014%7 Jun
dust212–120.0814%6 Jun
mirage11–130.0310%6 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0225%6 Jun
vertigo13–60.0515%6 Jun
cache13–50.0720%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0129%6 Jun
dust23–130.014%6 Jun
dust210–130.0315%4 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0414%4 Jun
nuke13–70.0813%3 Jun
cache13–50.0310%3 Jun
vertigo13–90.1123%3 Jun
dust213–10.1214%2 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0213%1 Jun
mirage13–110.0117%1 Jun
cache9–130.1219%31 May
anubis13–30.048%31 May
cache13–11-0.0417%31 May
dust213–10-0.0020%31 May
ancient13–90.028%28 May
dust213–110.028%27 May
anubis13–7-0.0014%27 May
cache13–30.0025%27 May
mirage11–130.0517%26 May
mirage13–100.0614%25 May
cache12–12-0.0212%25 May
cache13–40.0710%25 May
train9–130.0413%25 May
mirage7–130.0216%25 May
cache13–90.1321%25 May
inferno7–13-0.079%23 May
mirage13–50.0416%23 May
nuke13–90.0214%23 May
ancient13–100.0510%23 May
cache2–10-0.0629%23 May
anubis12–120.0813%23 May
dust26–13-0.0021%23 May
cache13–70.0527%23 May
inferno10–130.027%23 May
mirage13–30.0218%23 May
cache13–60.069%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →