󠁳⁧⁧ frag7r — CS2 Stats

76561198295979644[U:1:335713916]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,740Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,717Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10591 of 28611 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,710 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning44

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression6.8

Utility4.7

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.4

Utility4.7

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time582ms−71ms

first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy24.4%−2.8%

first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–10

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 28cacheWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	16–12	57%	0.02
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	0.02
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.02
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.02
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,327Matches

51%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

86.5ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	403	52%	1.07	17.3
Anubis	203	42%	1.00	16.8
Ancient	201	46%	0.97	16.4
Dust2	172	52%	1.09	16.9
Inferno	158	56%	1.07	17.3
Nuke	84	42%	1.03	17.7
Vertigo	78	59%	1.09	17.0
Overpass	42	62%	1.09	17.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.1%Spray accuracy

86.5%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

586msReaction time

31.4%T opening success

48.3%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

1.8%Flash assists

9.75HE damage / grenade

5.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3666% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	16–12	0.03	23%	29 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.06	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	19%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	17%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	25%	28 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	14%	28 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.00	32%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	33%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	27%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.14	23%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	26 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	22%	26 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	26%	25 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	32%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	44%	25 Aug →
office	13–5	-0.07	14%	24 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	17%	23 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	40%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.09	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.15	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	43%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	13%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	24%	23 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.10	57%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	28%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	22%	20 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.02	34%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.08	16%	20 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	32%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–2	0.06	26%	20 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	25%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	23%	19 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	20%	19 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	28%	19 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	33%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	28%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	31%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	11%	17 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	9%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.10	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	37%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.08	23%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	36%	10 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	6%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	13%	4 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	33%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	18%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.00	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	30%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.09	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	20%	19 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.07	18%	16 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.18	26%	16 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	31%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.07	42%	15 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	31%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	31%	14 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	24%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.04	48%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.09	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.02	23%	12 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	30%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	33%	12 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	24%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	33%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.08	29%	12 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.07	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	28%	12 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	21%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	31%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.00	31%	11 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.02	28%	11 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.04	24%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	20%	21 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.05	33%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.01	32%	20 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	27%	19 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.01	34%	19 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.04	22%	18 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.07	30%	18 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.03	20%	16 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.02	22%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.07	26%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.05	16%	7 Jun →