BazaHunter — CS2 Stats

76561198295947917[U:1:335682189]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,611Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,399Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11186 of 43318 tracked

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning64

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57–37–6Last 10057%Win rateWTLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression8.0

Utility6.8

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.4

Utility6.8

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time576ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	23	17–6	74%	0.03
dust2	S	16	11–5	69%	0.03
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	0.03
ancient	S	12	9–3	75%	0.04
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	0.04
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.00
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

318Matches

58%Win rate

1.54Avg K/D

95.8ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

46%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	44	70%	2.04	19.1
Dust2	23	74%	1.73	21.1
Ancient	14	43%	1.87	20.7
Nuke	11	82%	1.54	22.6
Vertigo	10	90%	2.23	19.3
Overpass	6	67%	1.21	16.3
Anubis	5	40%	0.93	15.2
Inferno	5	40%	1.78	22.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

88.7%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

571msReaction time

38.9%T opening success

45.9%CT opening success

0.80Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

12.14HE damage / grenade

10.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.9234% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	0.01	16%	29 Aug →
office	12–12	0.00	19%	29 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	21%	26 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	17%	26 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.01	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.18	5%	21 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	7%	21 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	22%	20 Aug →
train	10–13	0.04	33%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	19%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.13	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	33%	17 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.06	60%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	22%	17 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	25%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.12	8%	16 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.10	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	26%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.08	8%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.05	15%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	20%	11 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	19%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	22%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	25%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	15%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	7%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	24%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.00	14%	13 Jul →
alpine	13–7	0.07	23%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.13	6%	6 Jul →
warden	13–8	0.02	20%	6 Jul →
mirage	5–11	-0.08	2%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	16%	5 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	22%	3 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.07	6%	3 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	19%	2 Jul →
overpass	10–13	-0.02	18%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	19%	2 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	12%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.09	14%	29 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.01	5%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.01	31%	29 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.07	9%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.08	19%	28 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.04	6%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	22%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.01	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	17%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.05	20%	25 Jun →
train	13–2	-0.01	13%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.04	9%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	9%	25 Jun →
stronghold	8–13	-0.01	15%	24 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	9%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	16%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.04	23%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.12	21%	22 Jun →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	6%	16 Jun →
anubis	12–12	0.06	19%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.15	24%	14 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.04	14%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	11%	13 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.07	12%	13 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	14%	11 Jun →
anubis	15–15	0.05	14%	11 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.03	17%	10 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	20%	10 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.11	46%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.04	17%	10 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.02	14%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.03	7%	9 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.03	18%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.19	19%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	15%	8 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	17%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	17%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	13%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.00	21%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	12%	7 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	17%	7 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	21%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.01	23%	5 Jun →
overpass	15–15	-0.01	10%	5 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	26%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.06	11%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.08	16%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.09	27%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	12%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.08	20%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.03	21%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.11	22%	4 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.09	6%	4 Jun →
vertigo	5–13	-0.09	15%	3 Jun →