✪ Gl1tchHunter

✪ Gl1tchHunter — CS2 Stats

AU76561198294931719[U:1:334665991]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,593Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,801 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ Gl1tchHunterFACEITLevel 9 · 1,801 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning27
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY533710Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression2.2
Utility6.7
Positioning2.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning2.7
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time653ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
13Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA27161159%0.00
cacheC135838%0.01
dust2A106460%0.00
mirageD92722%-0.02
overpassC73443%-0.01
nukeS75271%0.01
italyS75271%0.00
anubis41325%-0.03
inferno42250%-0.02
ancient32167%-0.04
train32167%0.01
alpine21150%0.04
warden21150%0.03
vertigo110100%-0.06
stronghold110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

242Matches
55%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
67.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4351%0.8912.6
Ancient3063%0.9613.7
Anubis2560%1.1115.3
Inferno2050%0.9012.4
Dust22060%0.9814.4
Nuke1553%1.1115.3
Overpass956%1.2413.4
Train825%0.619.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
653msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.40HE damage / grenade
8.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3302% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass7–13-0.0329%16 Aug
overpass13–60.0624%15 Aug
overpass13–40.0127%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0820%31 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0816%24 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0632%21 Jun
cache5–13-0.0120%20 Jun
cache10–13-0.0317%19 Jun
office13–10-0.0523%18 Jun
office13–40.0048%11 Jun
nuke13–50.0219%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0529%11 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0146%11 Jun
dust24–13-0.0723%11 Jun
ancient13–6-0.1119%11 Jun
office11–13-0.0211%9 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0514%8 Jun
office13–2-0.0415%8 Jun
cache12–12-0.0416%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0239%6 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0419%5 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0318%5 Jun
office13–3-0.0443%5 Jun
dust26–13-0.0421%5 Jun
office13–80.0636%27 May
anubis9–13-0.0215%27 May
mirage6–13-0.0332%27 May
overpass12–120.0524%27 May
anubis3–13-0.0215%26 May
office13–60.048%26 May
italy13–40.0015%26 May
cache13–60.0723%26 May
cache6–13-0.059%26 May
train13–3-0.0318%23 May
ancient8–13-0.036%23 May
overpass13–90.0117%23 May
anubis13–7-0.0023%23 May
office13–40.1028%23 May
nuke13–10.0415%23 May
alpine13–20.1327%23 May
italy13–100.0025%23 May
mirage13–110.0315%23 May
vertigo13–3-0.0617%23 May
cache13–20.1718%23 May
warden13–20.0829%23 May
stronghold8–1-0.0115%23 May
inferno13–50.0117%23 May
dust213–11-0.0119%23 May
nuke8–13-0.077%22 May
cache13–70.0213%22 May
dust213–00.2229%20 May
office12–120.0623%19 May
italy13–8-0.0526%19 May
train13–110.0921%12 May
office13–70.1222%9 May
italy4–13-0.0524%9 May
office12–120.0220%8 May
cache9–13-0.0311%8 May
cache13–10.0719%8 May
cache6–13-0.0620%7 May
dust213–80.0922%7 May
cache11–130.0036%6 May
office5–13-0.0421%4 May
cache13–8-0.0029%4 May
cache12–12-0.0221%4 May
office13–7-0.0926%22 Apr
ancient13–60.0116%22 Apr
office6–13-0.0221%21 Apr
nuke12–120.0422%21 Apr
train12–12-0.0413%21 Apr
office13–6-0.0237%19 Apr
office11–13-0.0212%19 Apr
italy4–130.0338%19 Apr
dust29–13-0.0125%17 Apr
italy13–20.1423%14 Apr
alpine6–13-0.0625%14 Apr
dust213–10-0.0621%14 Apr
office5–13-0.0818%14 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0624%13 Apr
dust213–100.0214%12 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0024%12 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0912%10 Apr
dust23–13-0.0632%2 Apr
mirage13–90.0718%31 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0724%31 Mar
office13–80.0132%31 Mar
office13–6-0.0320%30 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0324%30 Mar
warden3–13-0.0335%30 Mar
dust213–10-0.0319%26 Mar
nuke13–110.0323%26 Mar
office10–130.0830%26 Mar
office13–90.0024%25 Mar
office12–12-0.0418%21 Mar
office12–12-0.0220%21 Mar
office10–13-0.0515%18 Mar
office13–40.1063%18 Mar
office13–100.0332%18 Mar
office13–90.0620%18 Mar
italy10–3-0.0430%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →