Wasd — CS2 Stats

CF76561198290296986[U:1:330031258]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

306Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.5 Learning

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim21

Positioning33

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.1

Aggression1.5

Utility6.1

Positioning3.3

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 786ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.1

Positioning3.3

Utility6.1

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact7.4

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time785ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 769ms → last ⅓ avg 785ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%−2.9%

first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–11

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

8–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 33dust2Weakest map · 44% over 41

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	41	18–23	44%	-0.02
mirage	A	33	18–15	55%	-0.03
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.05
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.04
nuke	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.07
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 41). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

345Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

67.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	13	54%	0.77	10.7
Inferno	10	30%	0.87	14.1
Mirage	10	30%	0.71	11.0
Ancient	7	43%	0.93	16.6
Anubis	7	57%	1.06	14.1
Cache	1	100%	1.25	10.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.42	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy

26.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

25.9%Spray accuracy

67.9%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

786msReaction time

15.6%T opening success

28.1%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

11.66HE damage / grenade

9.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 786.1105ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 15.5933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 41 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–9	-0.07	16%	22 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	24%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–5	-0.07	19%	24 Apr →
inferno	7–9	-0.01	21%	24 Apr →
mirage	10–0	-0.00	0%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	23%	17 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	12 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.02	17%	11 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	27%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–3	0.01	24%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	13%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–3	-0.07	19%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.07	16%	2 Apr →
vertigo	9–4	-0.01	21%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.10	20%	1 Apr →
inferno	4–9	-0.14	17%	28 Mar →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	18%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	15%	25 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	7%	22 Mar →
dust2	10–1	0.00	11%	22 Mar →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	27%	22 Mar →
dust2	6–13	0.02	18%	21 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	24%	15 Mar →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	22%	15 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	14%	13 Mar →
inferno	2–13	-0.12	6%	10 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	24%	7 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	13%	5 Mar →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	22%	28 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	20%	28 Feb →
inferno	13–7	0.01	25%	28 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	22%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	18%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	10%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.04	24%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–1	-0.07	11%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–10	-0.09	22%	21 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	7%	21 Feb →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	28%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	17%	19 Feb →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	21%	19 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	15%	19 Feb →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	27%	18 Feb →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	28%	18 Feb →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	20%	18 Feb →
mirage	10–3	0.00	8%	18 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	15%	17 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	16%	15 Feb →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	16%	12 Feb →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	14%	12 Feb →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	23%	11 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	20%	11 Feb →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	31%	9 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	18%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–1	0.05	17%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	17%	8 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	38%	8 Feb →
dust2	16–12	-0.04	14%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.03	32%	8 Feb →
inferno	13–7	0.03	22%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	39%	7 Feb →
anubis	15–15	-0.08	23%	7 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	15%	7 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.02	31%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	28%	6 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	24%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.01	19%	5 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	20%	4 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	2 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	24%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	9%	1 Feb →
dust2	8–13	0.01	19%	1 Feb →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	26%	31 Jan →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	12%	31 Jan →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	11%	31 Jan →
dust2	9–13	0.02	22%	31 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	18%	31 Jan →
nuke	13–7	-0.07	22%	31 Jan →
mirage	15–15	-0.07	16%	31 Jan →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	9%	30 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.02	33%	30 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.00	25%	30 Jan →
dust2	13–11	0.02	29%	30 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	14%	29 Jan →
inferno	8–9	-0.04	27%	29 Jan →
anubis	6–13	-0.11	6%	27 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	22%	26 Jan →
dust2	5–13	0.04	26%	26 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	25%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–11	0.05	21%	25 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	20%	25 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	21%	25 Jan →
mirage	12–2	-0.06	11%	25 Jan →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	41%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	35%	23 Jan →
inferno	15–15	-0.00	20%	23 Jan →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	25%	22 Jan →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	33%	22 Jan →
dust2	13–3	0.03	32%	22 Jan →
inferno	5–9	-0.19	13%	21 Jan →