BounDie — CS2 Stats

76561198290035498[U:1:329769770]

4,857Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#13125 of 13684 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,513 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,513Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,513
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 18 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBounDieFACEITLevel 7 · 1,513 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,513csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning33
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5644Last 10056%Win rateWLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression3.5
Utility4.8
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.3
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time571ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA45281762%0.00
anubisC1661038%-0.02
nukeA149564%0.01
dust2C104640%-0.02
infernoS96367%-0.02
ancient32167%-0.04
cache31233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,482Matches
49%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage78152%0.9814.9
Anubis46852%0.9214.8
Ancient29244%0.8814.1
Nuke16749%0.9515.0
Inferno12442%0.8814.0
Vertigo10945%0.8814.9
Dust210735%0.7914.1
Overpass4848%0.8313.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
10.38HE damage / grenade
4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0524% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0126%24 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0713%23 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0419%23 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0720%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.078%9 Aug
nuke10–130.0424%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.018%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0224%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0712%6 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0412%5 Aug
cache5–130.0320%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0111%4 Aug
mirage13–10.0411%2 Aug
anubis9–130.0127%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.1116%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0527%31 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0325%30 Jul
anubis17–19-0.0617%29 Jul
nuke16–19-0.0417%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.018%26 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0730%26 Jul
nuke13–50.1211%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0123%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0523%25 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0113%25 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0214%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0114%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0217%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0321%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0413%22 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0231%22 Jul
mirage8–130.0330%22 Jul
mirage9–130.0218%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0118%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0815%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0325%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0326%20 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0124%19 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0415%19 Jul
mirage7–130.0223%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0619%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0811%19 Jul
nuke13–30.1129%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0418%18 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0120%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.1035%18 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0315%17 Jul
dust210–13-0.0321%16 Jul
cache13–30.1023%16 Jul
inferno5–1-0.0514%16 Jul
mirage6–00.0311%16 Jul
nuke13–60.0524%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0012%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0126%14 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0513%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0314%14 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0324%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0214%13 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0214%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0415%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0128%11 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0319%11 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0516%11 Jul
dust213–90.0116%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0328%10 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0720%10 Jul
mirage3–11-0.0633%10 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0715%10 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0215%10 Jul
mirage13–30.1630%8 Jul
mirage13–90.0019%7 Jul
mirage13–9-0.035%6 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0129%5 Jul
mirage13–20.0716%5 Jul
mirage11–130.0519%4 Jul
dust210–13-0.0231%4 Jul
nuke16–130.0626%3 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0214%3 Jul
anubis13–70.0026%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0913%1 Jul
inferno13–60.0115%1 Jul
inferno13–80.0429%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0919%30 Jun
anubis13–40.0417%29 Jun
mirage13–30.0625%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.0512%29 Jun
mirage16–19-0.0213%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0216%28 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0220%28 Jun
dust213–70.1016%27 Jun
mirage13–90.0210%27 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0316%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0216%27 Jun
anubis9–130.0211%27 Jun
mirage10–130.1019%27 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0913%26 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0310%26 Jun
dust23–13-0.0324%24 Jun
mirage13–30.029%23 Jun
mirage13–50.0323%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →