Zoiphri — CS2 Stats

76561198289102985[U:1:328837257]

956Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,780Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#615 of 26733 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,243 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning67

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY66–31–3Last 10066%Win rateTLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression8.8

Utility6.2

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.7

Utility6.2

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time575ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy18.4%−4.3%

first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — dust2 5–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

11Longest win streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 21cacheWeakest map · 56% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	26	15–11	58%	0.03
dust2	S	21	16–5	76%	0.08
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	0.05
inferno	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

391Matches

55%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

88.2ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	98	53%	1.27	18.8
Dust2	53	58%	1.28	18.6
Ancient	52	54%	1.15	17.9
Inferno	39	59%	1.27	18.6
Anubis	29	62%	1.40	21.1
Train	4	50%	1.32	21.8
Vertigo	3	67%	1.01	17.7
Cache	3	33%	0.99	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy

41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.9%Spray accuracy

86.7%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

564msReaction time

35.5%T opening success

62.0%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

10.52HE damage / grenade

12.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4969 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.5359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	12–12	0.01	18%	7 Jun →
dust2	2–8	0.03	14%	7 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.02	16%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.09	6%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	6%	4 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.12	10%	4 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.08	14%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	4 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.01	17%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.07	16%	4 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	16%	4 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	27%	27 May →
cache	5–9	0.04	14%	26 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	33%	23 May →
nuke	13–3	0.08	23%	23 May →
mirage	13–1	0.13	21%	23 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	15%	23 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	22 May →
overpass	13–8	0.03	10%	21 May →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	18%	21 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	18%	21 May →
mirage	13–3	0.04	15%	21 May →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	22%	21 May →
mirage	16–19	-0.03	18%	20 May →
mirage	12–16	-0.07	12%	20 May →
mirage	13–6	0.07	32%	19 May →
mirage	16–19	-0.01	23%	18 May →
mirage	13–9	0.17	15%	17 May →
mirage	13–8	0.11	22%	17 May →
cache	13–8	0.06	19%	17 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	27%	10 May →
cache	8–13	0.00	28%	10 May →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	29%	3 May →
mirage	13–11	0.00	16%	3 May →
cache	11–13	-0.03	18%	2 May →
dust2	13–3	0.15	17%	2 May →
cache	19–17	0.01	34%	2 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	11%	1 May →
ancient	13–7	0.01	24%	1 May →
mirage	11–13	0.05	17%	1 May →
anubis	22–20	-0.02	26%	1 May →
inferno	6–13	0.04	22%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.05	36%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.08	24%	29 Apr →
dust2	3–13	0.06	32%	29 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.09	19%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	0.09	38%	29 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	24%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.02	31%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.06	12%	28 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	23%	28 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.03	26%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.10	31%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.12	25%	28 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.11	21%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.02	20%	27 Apr →
dust2	8–2	0.11	8%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.02	13%	27 Apr →
dust2	5–1	0.25	38%	27 Apr →
ancient	3–13	0.07	26%	27 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.04	16%	27 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.06	23%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	24%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.08	11%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.07	23%	24 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.16	21%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–2	0.11	19%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.04	27%	21 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.03	22%	21 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.08	17%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.04	19%	21 Apr →
dust2	16–12	0.06	24%	21 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	34%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	24%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.13	15%	20 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.03	18%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.08	18%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.08	36%	17 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	22%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.03	24%	16 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	22%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.07	22%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.08	23%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.01	22%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	16%	11 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.06	23%	11 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.04	16%	11 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.09	23%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.17	28%	10 Apr →
anubis	10–13	0.03	26%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.01	18%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	19%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.10	34%	2 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.02	25%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.09	21%	2 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.06	9%	2 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.05	23%	2 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.12	32%	2 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	22%	26 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.12	26%	26 Mar →