S0muel (-mirage please)

S0muel (-mirage please) — CS2 Stats

76561198287382056[U:1:327116328]Steam profile ↗

3,002Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,869Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4648 of 16950 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGS0muel (-mirage please)PREMIER22,869 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50491Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time524ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 13–5
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2491538%0.03
dust2B1991047%0.01
infernoS1711665%0.04
ancientA127558%0.01
nukeA116555%0.03
anubisD82625%0.00
cacheS76186%0.03
office1010%0.02
italy1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

479Matches
54%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
80.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8754%1.1417.2
Ancient5353%1.1516.6
Inferno4751%1.0917.0
Anubis4457%1.1915.9
Dust23858%1.3018.2
Vertigo2952%1.3318.8
Nuke2152%1.3518.1
Overpass560%1.0114.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
529msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.20HE damage / grenade
9.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4101% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0128%13 Aug
inferno11–130.1023%11 Aug
dust211–130.0011%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0323%10 Aug
cache4–00.0533%10 Aug
mirage4–130.0716%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0122%9 Aug
dust20–13-0.0629%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0417%8 Aug
mirage10–130.0618%7 Aug
cache13–60.0414%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0121%7 Aug
mirage13–30.1516%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0318%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0613%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0018%6 Aug
dust216–120.0520%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0426%6 Aug
ancient13–60.0419%5 Aug
inferno13–30.0318%5 Aug
office6–130.028%3 Aug
dust27–130.0638%3 Aug
anubis10–130.005%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0215%2 Aug
nuke15–150.0211%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0715%29 Jul
cache13–30.0523%27 Jul
ancient13–50.0417%27 Jul
cache13–100.0518%27 Jul
anubis3–13-0.1231%27 Jul
mirage10–130.0418%26 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0213%25 Jul
cache13–7-0.0126%25 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0014%25 Jul
inferno13–160.0115%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0119%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0219%22 Jul
cache13–16-0.0115%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0612%21 Jul
dust27–13-0.0020%21 Jul
mirage5–130.0422%21 Jul
nuke7–130.0820%21 Jul
inferno13–40.0121%21 Jul
ancient13–80.1223%21 Jul
dust20–13-0.040%21 Jul
dust213–50.0223%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.009%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0035%20 Jul
anubis16–140.0116%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0212%20 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0617%19 Jul
dust213–160.0317%19 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0210%19 Jul
mirage13–50.0219%19 Jul
cache13–70.0218%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0221%19 Jul
dust213–7-0.0113%18 Jul
dust29–130.0216%18 Jul
dust27–130.0213%16 Jul
ancient3–130.0113%16 Jul
mirage4–130.0114%15 Jul
ancient16–130.0316%15 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0217%15 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0117%14 Jul
inferno7–130.1121%14 Jul
dust213–70.055%14 Jul
dust213–100.0411%14 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0211%14 Jul
mirage13–30.0515%13 Jul
inferno13–00.060%13 Jul
inferno13–90.0627%13 Jul
italy2–50.0238%13 Jul
nuke6–130.0512%13 Jul
anubis9–130.0216%13 Jul
dust213–70.0317%12 Jul
mirage16–130.0111%12 Jul
dust213–70.0116%11 Jul
anubis13–30.1110%11 Jul
mirage14–160.0114%11 Jul
anubis6–13-0.045%9 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0414%8 Jul
nuke13–110.1415%7 Jul
mirage13–50.0510%6 Jul
inferno13–50.1918%6 Jul
ancient7–130.0416%6 Jul
inferno8–130.0017%5 Jul
inferno13–110.1114%5 Jul
anubis8–130.0421%2 Jul
nuke4–130.018%2 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0450%1 Jul
dust213–100.0417%29 Jun
dust213–20.0715%29 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0019%23 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0013%22 Jun
mirage4–130.0113%22 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0115%22 Jun
nuke13–90.0216%22 Jun
inferno9–130.0125%21 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0619%21 Jun
mirage13–30.0315%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →