itzme セドリック

itzme セドリック — CS2 Stats

BE76561198275125554[U:1:314859826]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

767Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,865Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12157 of 42415 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGitzme セドリックPREMIER21,865 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression9.6
Utility5.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time567ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30141647%0.02
mirageA1811761%0.01
ancientA169756%0.02
anubisA148657%0.03
nukeS129375%0.03
infernoD72529%0.02
overpass21150%0.04
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

290Matches
58%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
91.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5159%1.2217.2
Dust23336%1.1819.4
Ancient2770%1.0817.5
Anubis2642%1.1619.9
Vertigo1486%1.4721.5
Inferno1242%1.2015.5
Nuke1275%1.2418.0
Overpass475%1.2017.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
564msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
13.72HE damage / grenade
4.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5403% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0221%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0514%29 Aug
anubis13–20.0331%29 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0228%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0447%28 Aug
anubis13–110.0215%28 Aug
anubis16–130.1126%28 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0216%27 Aug
dust213–60.1427%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0511%25 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0715%23 Aug
mirage13–00.0213%21 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0028%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0429%8 Aug
dust216–12-0.0124%6 Aug
mirage11–130.0318%6 Aug
ancient13–80.1323%6 Aug
mirage13–30.1020%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0217%5 Aug
anubis8–00.1035%5 Aug
ancient13–80.0331%5 Aug
inferno0–70.016%5 Aug
ancient11–130.098%5 Aug
dust23–13-0.0416%5 Aug
dust22–130.0226%4 Aug
dust213–70.0329%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0616%4 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0024%4 Aug
anubis19–170.0222%4 Aug
ancient13–70.0423%24 Jul
anubis11–130.0228%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0719%15 Jul
dust25–130.0120%11 Jul
dust28–130.0724%11 Jul
ancient13–80.0616%9 Jul
nuke13–50.079%9 Jul
inferno13–50.0417%9 Jul
anubis7–130.0323%8 Jul
nuke13–80.0227%6 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0321%5 Jul
ancient13–90.0114%4 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0520%3 Jul
dust29–13-0.0126%2 Jul
dust216–130.0729%29 Jun
anubis13–90.0520%28 Jun
dust213–70.0731%28 Jun
ancient11–130.0415%28 Jun
anubis9–130.0123%27 Jun
nuke13–70.0241%27 Jun
dust26–13-0.0037%27 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0427%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0129%27 Jun
dust213–7-0.0318%26 Jun
inferno4–130.0526%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0015%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0318%25 Jun
ancient13–50.1030%24 Jun
dust213–80.1226%24 Jun
dust213–40.0119%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0933%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0516%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0125%21 Jun
dust210–13-0.0426%21 Jun
inferno5–110.0822%20 Jun
dust215–15-0.0213%20 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0114%19 Jun
dust213–110.0322%18 Jun
nuke16–140.0219%18 Jun
overpass13–60.0623%18 Jun
overpass9–130.0119%18 Jun
nuke10–130.0325%14 Jun
mirage11–130.0518%14 Jun
vertigo6–130.0519%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0316%13 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0112%12 Jun
anubis13–110.0614%12 Jun
nuke10–130.0324%12 Jun
dust216–130.0427%12 Jun
dust211–130.0029%12 Jun
nuke13–80.0827%10 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0029%10 Jun
nuke14–160.0517%9 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0115%8 Jun
ancient1–5-0.090%8 Jun
dust213–160.0128%6 Jun
inferno4–130.0129%6 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0124%3 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0218%3 Jun
mirage13–110.0211%1 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0218%31 May
dust211–13-0.0719%31 May
nuke13–40.1114%30 May
dust213–50.1520%30 May
anubis11–13-0.0116%28 May
dust213–20.1325%28 May
dust213–9-0.0025%27 May
inferno7–13-0.0429%26 May
dust210–130.0125%25 May
mirage11–130.0125%25 May
dust210–130.0323%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →