pz ez — CS2 Stats

US76561198265067406[U:1:304801678]Steam profile ↗

630Tracked matches72%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.9 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,898Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#680 of 10749 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,260 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning69

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression8.8

Utility5.8

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.9

Utility5.8

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time548ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms

Headshot accuracy28.1%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 30.0% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — ancient 9–13

13–1Biggest win — inferno

10Longest win streak

9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 48% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	21	10–11	48%	0.01
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	0.03
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	0.05
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	0.03
cache	S	12	9–3	75%	0.05
inferno	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

119Matches

59%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

91.0ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	31	55%	1.44	20.3
Ancient	22	68%	1.56	20.3
Dust2	20	55%	1.44	18.7
Inferno	11	64%	1.36	19.4
Cache	10	80%	1.11	17.6
Nuke	8	50%	1.79	16.6
Anubis	5	40%	0.86	12.4
Vertigo	4	75%	1.42	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.2%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.7%Spray accuracy

86.9%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

548msReaction time

38.1%T opening success

53.5%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

15.0%Flash assists

7.88HE damage / grenade

5.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	0.02	33%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	22%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	26%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.08	39%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	24%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	36%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	44%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.13	39%	14 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.12	41%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	31%	9 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	40%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.04	28%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.02	18%	6 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	28%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	32%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	36%	5 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	24%	4 Aug →
cache	19–15	0.10	30%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	41%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.06	28%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	40%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	19–17	-0.00	19%	27 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	24%	27 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.04	22%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.06	21%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	33%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.09	17%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	18%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.09	16%	23 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	32%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	27%	23 Jul →
nuke	2–8	-0.06	25%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	16%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	39%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	21 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.00	22%	20 Jul →
anubis	3–2	-0.00	50%	20 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	35%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	32%	19 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	38%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	22%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	30%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.07	50%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	33%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	41%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	30%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.01	26%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.27	35%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	30%	14 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.10	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	30%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	42%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	23%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	29%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.12	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	25%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	45%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.07	46%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	31%	11 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	36%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	18%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	25%	10 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.08	44%	10 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.01	32%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.09	38%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.12	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.00	21%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.23	32%	9 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.11	26%	9 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.00	50%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.11	56%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.08	22%	2 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	21%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	22%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	26%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.00	21%	30 Jun →
inferno	14–16	0.04	37%	30 Jun →
ancient	16–12	0.02	24%	20 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	24%	18 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.03	26%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.05	26%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	24%	6 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	24%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	21%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	33%	3 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.00	38%	2 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.11	37%	27 May →