[F.C.F] - Prowler — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198264546882[U:1:304281154]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,953Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.7 Learning

Premier CS Rating7,627Light Blue band · top ~66.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11676 of 15533 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

6,630Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 7,627
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,373 to go
Reached: Light Blue band
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44

Positioning42

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4

Aggression6.5

Utility5.9

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4

Positioning4.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time594ms−5ms

first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

8–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	24	12–12	50%	0.00
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	0.00
dust2	A	23	13–10	57%	0.01
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.00
ancient	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.02
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.01
cache	D	5	1–4	20%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

63Matches

37%Win rate

0.66Avg K/D

—ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy

30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.7%Spray accuracy

71.0%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

589msReaction time

27.1%T opening success

45.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

8.30HE damage / grenade

8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6554% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.1216% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	6–13	-0.03	6%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	11%	28 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.00	25%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–1	-0.02	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	26%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	24%	26 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	14%	25 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	12%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.09	35%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	22%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	8%	20 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.00	13%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	12%	18 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	11%	18 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	5%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.14	12%	18 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	9%	18 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	5%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	5%	17 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	24%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.09	7%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	23%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.12	13%	12 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	13%	12 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.05	9%	11 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.10	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	21%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	9%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	5%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.15	25%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.07	67%	9 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	11%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	5%	6 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	8%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	5%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.12	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	17%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	11%	3 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.02	6%	1 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	11%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.05	5%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	13%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	13%	30 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.10	10%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.03	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	8%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	8%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.08	9%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	11%	28 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	10%	28 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	33%	26 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	14%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	6%	26 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	6%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.08	15%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	3%	21 Jul →
inferno	12–2	-0.02	0%	21 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	16%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	9%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	8%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	4%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.02	9%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.06	13%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	9%	20 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	18%	20 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.02	10%	19 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.07	10%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.04	9%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	26%	18 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.10	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	2–8	-0.02	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.07	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	4%	18 Jul →