qta — CS2 Stats

76561198264534253[U:1:304268525]

833Tracked matches76%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,476Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5769 of 26387 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,921 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGqtaFACEITLevel 10 · 2,921 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,476 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT70273Last 10070%Win rateLWWTWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression5.7
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time555ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
11Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS36261072%0.02
dust2S3021970%0.01
cacheS1210283%0.03
overpassS96367%-0.01
anubisB63350%0.01
inferno42250%-0.03
ancient21150%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

824Matches
62%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
79.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19366%1.2416.1
Dust210061%1.1816.8
Anubis6057%1.1116.0
Overpass4852%1.1418.4
Inferno3435%1.0015.3
Train2250%1.1913.6
Cache1861%1.2216.1
Ancient850%1.1018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
562msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
7.29HE damage / grenade
7.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0474% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.1220%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.016%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0324%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0240%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0522%5 Aug
mirage13–30.1842%26 Jul
cache13–5-0.0021%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0513%5 Jul
cache13–70.0518%4 Jul
dust213–110.0125%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.0723%12 Jun
cache8–13-0.0115%12 Jun
dust213–60.0921%2 Jun
cache13–20.0025%2 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0456%2 Jun
mirage13–40.0527%2 Jun
mirage4–130.0215%27 May
dust213–7-0.0124%26 May
overpass21–25-0.0216%17 May
cache8–13-0.0747%13 May
dust213–100.0225%11 May
cache13–60.0627%11 May
mirage13–6-0.0120%10 May
cache13–90.0224%10 May
cache13–40.1627%10 May
cache4–00.1333%10 May
cache13–110.0430%5 May
inferno9–60.0150%20 Apr
inferno6–9-0.1418%20 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0235%20 Apr
dust213–70.0142%20 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0117%29 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0426%29 Mar
dust213–11-0.0418%29 Mar
mirage0–3-0.120%24 Mar
overpass1–1-0.120%24 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0125%24 Mar
overpass13–80.0510%22 Mar
mirage13–4-0.037%22 Mar
dust212–12-0.0518%22 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0330%20 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0121%7 Mar
mirage13–10.0529%7 Mar
dust213–30.0129%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0115%5 Mar
mirage12–40.0326%28 Feb
dust213–10-0.0322%28 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0521%28 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0328%25 Feb
dust213–5-0.0610%25 Feb
mirage13–110.0120%24 Feb
mirage13–30.0926%22 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0421%21 Feb
dust27–130.0032%21 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0612%19 Feb
mirage5–130.0022%17 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0022%16 Feb
anubis13–30.0818%15 Feb
mirage13–10.2431%15 Feb
overpass13–30.0131%13 Feb
mirage13–20.0827%13 Feb
dust213–80.0626%13 Feb
mirage13–30.0038%13 Feb
dust213–50.0318%13 Feb
dust213–100.0135%9 Feb
dust213–60.0624%9 Feb
mirage7–00.0525%9 Feb
anubis13–30.0738%9 Feb
dust27–13-0.0229%8 Feb
anubis9–130.0535%8 Feb
mirage11–130.0323%8 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0023%7 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0214%7 Feb
dust211–130.0324%7 Feb
overpass13–60.0526%6 Feb
mirage13–10.0931%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0626%25 Jan
vertigo9–10.2024%24 Jan
ancient13–100.0324%23 Jan
mirage13–40.0833%21 Jan
inferno13–40.0215%16 Jan
mirage13–80.0812%13 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0533%11 Jan
dust23–13-0.0512%11 Jan
anubis12–12-0.0117%11 Jan
dust213–90.0433%11 Jan
dust213–90.0930%11 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0424%10 Jan
dust211–13-0.0324%9 Jan
dust213–50.1124%9 Jan
dust216–140.0020%9 Jan
overpass7–130.0211%7 Jan
dust213–40.0135%4 Jan
dust27–130.0019%4 Jan
mirage13–20.0716%4 Jan
dust213–9-0.0313%28 Dec
dust213–110.0417%19 Dec
overpass16–13-0.0314%16 Dec
mirage10–130.0531%15 Dec
dust213–30.0328%15 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO500 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →