CalciuM — CS2 Stats

76561198260021061[U:1:299755333]

1,612Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,580Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15147 of 50807 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCalciuMFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,580 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning37
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression3.4
Utility4.4
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning3.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time603ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 36% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C28101836%-0.01
mirageA28171161%0.00
ancientS107370%0.00
infernoC104640%-0.02
nukeS96367%-0.03
cacheB84450%-0.01
anubis3030%-0.04
train32167%0.01
vertigo110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

269Matches
54%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
83.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4457%1.2017.8
Dust22854%1.0917.0
Inferno1942%0.9316.5
Ancient1457%0.8214.1
Anubis714%0.8712.0
Vertigo667%0.9517.0
Nuke425%1.1616.0
Overpass1100%1.0912.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
87.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
612msReaction time
21.3%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.13HE damage / grenade
9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.3306% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–130.0019%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.047%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0810%25 Aug
dust213–3-0.0726%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0021%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0619%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.0235%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0211%22 Aug
cache13–4-0.0121%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0426%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0121%17 Aug
mirage9–130.0029%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0718%14 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0532%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0614%14 Aug
mirage6–130.0019%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0124%14 Aug
vertigo13–110.0624%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0614%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0118%13 Aug
cache6–13-0.0329%13 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0027%12 Aug
dust213–10.0718%12 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0519%12 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0529%12 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0116%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0432%11 Aug
nuke13–40.0227%11 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0017%11 Aug
dust212–16-0.0134%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0624%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0213%11 Aug
dust213–00.1125%11 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0824%11 Aug
dust21–13-0.1024%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0927%9 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0131%9 Aug
cache13–7-0.0214%9 Aug
cache6–13-0.0522%9 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0017%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0712%7 Aug
dust213–40.0134%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0220%7 Aug
dust215–15-0.0318%6 Aug
cache13–70.0930%6 Aug
nuke3–13-0.078%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0813%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0215%6 Aug
cache10–13-0.019%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0424%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0815%5 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0225%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0123%5 Aug
dust213–60.0424%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0116%4 Aug
ancient13–100.0029%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0214%4 Aug
dust213–30.0121%4 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0218%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0515%3 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0629%3 Aug
dust213–110.0516%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0418%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0417%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0511%2 Aug
ancient13–30.1116%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0622%4 Apr
dust22–40.0914%24 Mar
mirage9–130.0119%24 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0116%24 Mar
nuke13–70.0318%20 Mar
train13–110.0627%18 Mar
dust211–13-0.0111%18 Mar
dust213–80.0324%16 Mar
mirage13–110.0311%15 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0810%15 Mar
dust213–110.0421%14 Mar
dust24–8-0.0221%14 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0119%14 Mar
dust213–100.0624%12 Mar
mirage13–60.0115%10 Mar
inferno13–110.0523%9 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0316%9 Mar
inferno13–80.0222%8 Mar
train13–6-0.0316%8 Mar
mirage13–20.1424%8 Mar
ancient13–30.0518%8 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0422%7 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0010%7 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0515%5 Mar
mirage6–20.0816%5 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0232%4 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0122%3 Mar
train7–130.0127%2 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0519%2 Mar
dust23–13-0.0116%1 Mar
mirage13–60.0416%1 Mar
mirage0–9-0.086%1 Mar
ancient13–110.0314%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →