Kuroshima — CS2 Stats

US76561198259042804[U:1:298777076]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

972Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.3 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating27,180Top 5% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1823 of 55237 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,025 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

27,180Peak Premier on CSDB

2,025Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,025
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 475 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 27,180
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,820 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-30
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim98

Positioning65

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT71–25–4Last 10071%Win rateWWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.8

Aggression10.0

Utility3.5

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels7.5

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 98 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 70% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 70% on CT to 50% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.8

Positioning6.5

Utility3.5

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels7.5

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time480ms−111ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms

Headshot accuracy36.7%+4.7%

first ⅓ avg 32.0% → last ⅓ avg 36.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — nuke 9–5

13–0Biggest win — anubis

11Longest win streak

W6Current streak

2–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 85% over 13ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	19	12–7	63%	0.03
dust2	S	17	12–5	71%	0.03
anubis	S	15	12–3	80%	0.04
mirage	S	15	12–3	80%	0.04
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	0.02
inferno	S	13	11–2	85%	0.07
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	0.07
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.09
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

542Matches

57%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

89.2ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	27	56%	1.13	19.0
Dust2	23	70%	1.36	22.1
Mirage	21	62%	1.31	18.6
Inferno	11	55%	1.08	16.8
Anubis	9	78%	1.32	18.7
Cache	2	100%	1.65	23.5
Overpass	1	100%	2.38	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

37.3%Headshot accuracy

40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.2%Spray accuracy

91.6%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

493msReaction time

49.8%T opening success

69.9%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

4.6%Flash assists

4.27HE damage / grenade

4.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–3	0.16	42%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.12	53%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	36%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	39%	29 Aug →
overpass	13–2	0.12	42%	29 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.02	21%	29 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	36%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.07	44%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	50%	12 Aug →
cache	8–4	-0.04	32%	12 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	49%	12 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.07	32%	12 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	10–1	0.08	39%	12 Aug →
ancient	0–4	-0.06	67%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.06	38%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	39%	7 Aug →
cache	1–8	-0.06	11%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.16	24%	23 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.06	39%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	29%	22 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	42%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	32%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.00	34%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.10	38%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	39%	19 Jul →
inferno	0–2	0.00	0%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	34%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	41%	19 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	41%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.00	60%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	26%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.06	37%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	39%	16 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.09	41%	16 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	47%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.15	38%	14 Jul →
anubis	5–0	0.05	28%	14 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.05	36%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.12	35%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.10	44%	25 Jun →
cache	7–1	0.07	52%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.05	38%	25 Jun →
inferno	5–1	0.11	70%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.04	33%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.05	33%	24 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.00	31%	24 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	34%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	43%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.17	43%	22 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.05	39%	22 Jun →
mirage	9–1	0.11	36%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.12	35%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.06	42%	21 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	27%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	30%	21 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.01	18%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.10	40%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.04	38%	21 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.01	27%	19 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	18 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.10	40%	18 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.07	27%	18 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.01	43%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–0	0.07	43%	17 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.09	38%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	34%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.01	30%	16 Jun →
nuke	9–5	0.27	35%	15 Jun →
inferno	5–9	0.08	39%	15 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.03	38%	14 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	21%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.00	30%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	33%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	29%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.04	27%	11 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	42%	11 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.14	37%	7 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.05	31%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	32%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.02	38%	6 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.04	21%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	18%	4 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	37%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.02	27%	2 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.05	29%	31 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	32%	31 May →
ancient	10–13	0.03	33%	31 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	23%	31 May →
ancient	13–2	-0.07	50%	31 May →
dust2	14–16	0.01	20%	31 May →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	30%	30 May →
ancient	13–3	0.08	45%	30 May →
cache	5–13	-0.01	44%	30 May →
cache	12–12	0.05	36%	29 May →
inferno	13–7	0.03	37%	29 May →
mirage	1–2	-0.07	0%	29 May →
dust2	13–3	0.08	30%	29 May →
vertigo	13–10	0.04	38%	28 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	43%	27 May →