Pluto Nash

Pluto Nash — CS2 Stats

76561198257898268[U:1:297632540]Steam profile ↗

323Tracked matches59%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning54
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY504010Last 10050%Win rateWTWTLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression6.8
Utility2.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.1

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.4
Utility2.8
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time663ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 5–2
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10officeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B179853%-0.01
vertigoA127558%0.01
anubisC114736%0.02
officeD113827%-0.01
cacheS107370%0.01
trainS96367%-0.00
mirageB84450%-0.01
ancientD62433%0.01
infernoD62433%-0.02
overpassB63350%-0.01
nuke220100%-0.01
boulder1010%0.00
warden110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
89.5%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
668msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
4.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3381 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9152% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.006%11 Aug
ancient12–120.0522%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0214%11 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0019%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0413%28 Jul
anubis13–80.0012%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0614%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.0322%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0919%21 Jul
dust213–30.0018%20 Jul
boulder12–120.0010%20 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0011%13 Jul
nuke13–110.0323%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0418%13 Jul
office6–13-0.0332%13 Jul
mirage13–10.0619%6 Jul
cache8–13-0.0116%6 Jul
cache13–8-0.0018%6 Jul
ancient8–130.0312%30 Jun
nuke2–3-0.0414%30 Jun
cache13–80.0318%30 Jun
dust213–6-0.0219%30 Jun
train13–8-0.084%23 Jun
train4–00.0957%23 Jun
train11–13-0.0321%23 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0115%16 Jun
dust27–130.0014%16 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0114%16 Jun
vertigo13–70.0317%6 Jun
vertigo13–40.0318%6 Jun
dust213–8-0.0011%1 Jun
anubis13–30.0816%1 Jun
mirage6–130.0218%26 May
cache13–50.0112%26 May
ancient6–130.0617%26 May
dust25–13-0.0619%26 May
dust24–13-0.0714%26 May
cache13–5-0.0222%19 May
office9–00.0425%19 May
office9–13-0.0214%17 May
cache13–11-0.0015%9 May
cache12–12-0.0812%9 May
cache5–20.1724%9 May
cache13–20.0618%2 May
dust24–13-0.0422%28 Apr
train13–100.0538%28 Apr
train13–10-0.0125%28 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0313%21 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0113%14 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.0221%14 Apr
vertigo9–13-0.0116%14 Apr
vertigo2–13-0.0519%14 Apr
vertigo2–13-0.0328%14 Apr
anubis5–130.0426%4 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0414%29 Mar
dust22–13-0.100%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.059%29 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0313%29 Mar
office13–5-0.0417%20 Mar
office2–130.0127%20 Mar
office4–130.0128%20 Mar
office2–00.000%20 Mar
office8–13-0.0522%20 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0311%12 Mar
overpass10–130.0229%12 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0231%10 Mar
dust213–6-0.0012%10 Mar
train12–12-0.0325%3 Mar
train8–13-0.0223%3 Mar
mirage13–90.0722%24 Feb
dust213–7-0.0417%24 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0317%24 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0314%17 Feb
vertigo12–120.0419%17 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0030%10 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0123%10 Feb
anubis12–120.0110%10 Feb
warden13–50.065%4 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0216%3 Feb
vertigo13–50.0313%3 Feb
office9–13-0.0219%25 Jan
office0–5-0.090%25 Jan
office12–120.1324%25 Jan
dust213–50.1018%16 Jan
overpass12–120.0217%16 Jan
dust213–7-0.0520%12 Jan
dust23–130.0434%12 Jan
dust28–130.0220%11 Jan
overpass8–130.0124%11 Jan
dust213–60.0120%6 Jan
train13–70.0023%6 Jan
train13–80.0214%6 Jan
dust211–130.0321%29 Dec
anubis6–130.1219%29 Dec
vertigo13–20.0621%23 Dec
vertigo13–100.0315%23 Dec
anubis13–70.0523%16 Dec
vertigo13–11-0.0220%9 Dec
anubis12–120.0214%9 Dec
dust213–10-0.0527%9 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →