KeFUri — CS2 Stats

76561198257165289[U:1:296899561]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

888Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,869Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4909 of 18112 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning54

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–40–1Last 10059%Win rateWWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0

Aggression6.6

Utility4.3

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning5.4

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time591ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–7

13–0Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9overpassWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.00
ancient	S	22	15–7	68%	0.00
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.00
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
dust2	S	9	6–3	67%	-0.02
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.01
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches

51%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

76.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Cache	3	0%	1.21	18.0
Nuke	3	67%	0.79	14.3
Anubis	3	67%	1.15	22.3
CONTEST Tundra	3	67%	0.83	13.7
CONTEST Barranco	3	33%	1.41	18.3
Dust2	2	50%	0.98	14.5
Breach 3.0	1	0%	0.72	13.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.1%Spray accuracy

82.1%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

591msReaction time

26.8%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

6.14HE damage / grenade

6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.8487% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	-0.07	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	18%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	14%	13 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	13%	10 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	23%	5 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.02	37%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	20%	4 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	20%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.02	21%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	15%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.07	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	18%	1 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	13%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	17%	27 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	20%	27 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.01	9%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	21%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.00	11%	18 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.00	14%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	38%	18 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.00	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.09	16%	18 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	12%	17 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.00	22%	14 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.08	19%	14 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.12	15%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.11	23%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.11	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	7%	12 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	22%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	25%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.11	19%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	19%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.05	19%	10 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.08	25%	6 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.01	8%	6 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	18%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.10	18%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	12%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	15%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	23%	3 Jul →
overpass	3–13	-0.04	24%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.07	8%	22 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.03	21%	19 Jun →
ancient	0–6	-0.03	33%	19 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.03	14%	16 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	17%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	13%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.00	16%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.04	17%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.01	43%	15 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.02	13%	15 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.05	13%	15 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	15%	14 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	27%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.04	26%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	20%	11 Jun →
overpass	15–15	0.03	20%	10 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	15%	10 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.01	18%	10 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	14%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.07	26%	9 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	31%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.01	20%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	32%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.01	19%	7 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	28%	5 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	31%	5 Jun →
inferno	16–12	-0.01	12%	31 May →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	18%	31 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	23%	30 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.11	18%	30 May →
inferno	13–10	0.03	25%	30 May →
nuke	13–1	-0.00	15%	29 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	13%	28 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	20%	27 May →
ancient	13–10	0.10	19%	27 May →
cache	6–13	-0.05	18%	20 May →
nuke	11–13	0.00	8%	20 May →
cache	13–7	0.03	25%	19 May →
inferno	10–2	0.05	14%	19 May →
anubis	7–13	0.04	13%	18 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	21%	18 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	31%	18 May →
cache	13–9	0.00	30%	17 May →
overpass	6–13	-0.05	22%	17 May →
cache	11–13	-0.02	16%	17 May →
overpass	13–5	0.04	25%	17 May →
ancient	13–11	0.04	11%	17 May →
cache	8–13	-0.03	17%	17 May →