matthew golden lover

matthew golden lover — CS2 Stats

76561198253915227[U:1:293649499]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

327Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmatthew golden loverFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning57
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44524Last 10044%Win rateLTWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression6.8
Utility7.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.7
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time614ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
18In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26111542%0.04
mirageA2112957%0.03
nukeB157847%0.05
ancientD1441029%0.04
infernoC104640%0.02
overpassS64267%0.07
cacheC52340%0.06
anubis2020%-0.00
office1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

108Matches
50%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
97.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2352%1.4619.8
Nuke1765%1.5420.3
Dust21533%1.3020.2
Ancient1127%1.3517.3
Inferno633%1.3617.7
Anubis367%0.9815.3
Overpass250%2.1821.5
Train1100%1.0013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
620msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
13.9%Flash assists
14.71HE damage / grenade
11.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7423% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0311%28 Aug
dust212–120.1729%28 Aug
dust213–50.0738%28 Aug
nuke13–100.1821%23 Aug
nuke3–11-0.0718%23 Aug
dust22–13-0.0623%17 Aug
dust27–130.0117%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0435%12 Aug
dust213–160.0124%12 Aug
inferno8–130.0220%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0723%11 Aug
dust24–13-0.0219%2 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0020%31 Jul
dust210–130.0025%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0313%31 Jul
mirage12–160.0312%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0118%30 Jul
dust213–50.0327%30 May
mirage12–12-0.0413%30 May
dust213–40.1317%30 May
inferno12–160.0626%29 May
dust216–120.0313%28 May
ancient6–130.0015%28 May
dust213–70.0720%13 May
ancient1–13-0.0126%13 May
ancient12–160.0125%12 May
mirage13–40.0816%11 May
ancient14–160.0118%11 May
dust213–90.0828%11 May
mirage13–30.0622%11 May
dust27–130.0229%11 May
cache13–50.0821%8 May
mirage13–90.0524%8 May
mirage13–20.0416%8 May
cache9–130.0314%8 May
nuke9–130.1131%3 May
dust213–30.2637%3 May
cache9–130.0830%3 May
overpass6–130.0317%3 May
cache13–50.0624%1 May
ancient10–130.0920%1 May
inferno16–140.0526%1 May
cache12–120.0314%30 Apr
mirage13–80.0521%22 Apr
inferno13–60.0112%22 Apr
inferno13–20.0226%22 Apr
ancient13–50.1631%22 Apr
ancient11–130.0717%22 Apr
dust213–50.1120%21 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0310%21 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0124%21 Apr
inferno6–130.0121%21 Apr
inferno11–130.0623%17 Apr
nuke8–130.0324%16 Apr
overpass13–100.1114%16 Apr
nuke13–30.1418%16 Apr
anubis9–130.0021%16 Apr
dust26–130.0019%16 Apr
dust210–130.0415%16 Apr
mirage13–60.1321%16 Apr
mirage10–130.0224%16 Apr
dust29–13-0.0321%11 Apr
inferno16–130.0514%4 Apr
overpass13–80.0925%4 Apr
ancient14–160.0720%4 Apr
ancient13–100.0835%4 Apr
nuke0–13-0.0931%14 Mar
office6–13-0.0432%14 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0122%4 Mar
ancient13–70.0433%28 Feb
anubis1–8-0.0145%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0229%26 Feb
dust23–130.0319%20 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0426%20 Feb
nuke13–160.0331%20 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0115%20 Feb
dust21–13-0.0531%12 Feb
mirage13–60.0623%31 Jan
nuke11–130.1120%30 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0721%28 Jan
dust24–13-0.0511%31 Dec
mirage13–100.0123%16 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0218%4 Nov
ancient13–50.0012%4 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0124%10 Sept
nuke13–60.0621%6 Sept
dust213–90.0519%3 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0631%3 Sept
overpass12–120.1519%30 Aug
inferno6–130.0223%30 Aug
overpass13–100.1215%26 Aug
nuke13–70.0323%20 Aug
dust213–40.0616%16 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0016%15 Aug
mirage13–10.1427%15 Aug
dust216–130.0733%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0027%15 Aug
nuke13–50.1721%15 Aug
nuke13–60.0526%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →