fizz — CS2 Stats

GB76561198252800634[U:1:292534906]Steam profile ↗

1,638Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,469 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning54

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.3

Utility5.6

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.4

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time546ms−67ms

first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — vertigo 13–4

13–0Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L6Current streak

6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	31	16–15	52%	-0.00
dust2	A	17	10–7	59%	0.03
ancient	C	14	5–9	36%	0.01
inferno	A	14	8–6	57%	0.01
nuke	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.00
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,745Matches

53%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

76.5ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	285	48%	1.11	15.7
Dust2	193	53%	1.15	15.7
Ancient	116	53%	1.07	15.5
Nuke	95	54%	1.13	16.5
Anubis	63	67%	1.11	14.8
Overpass	56	62%	1.45	15.6
Inferno	40	45%	1.12	15.2
Train	7	57%	1.67	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

84.8%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

551msReaction time

22.7%T opening success

42.4%CT opening success

0.80Enemies flashed / flash

7.1%Flash assists

7.39HE damage / grenade

7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.7063% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	-0.05	11%	1 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.00	18%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	23%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.00	25%	28 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	8%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	28%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.05	38%	18 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.00	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.14	22%	13 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	28%	17 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	23%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.06	23%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	11%	18 May →
nuke	13–2	0.02	10%	11 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	7%	11 May →
dust2	16–12	0.06	22%	20 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	13%	17 Apr →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	15%	26 Mar →
ancient	5–13	0.03	10%	24 Mar →
overpass	13–7	0.00	19%	19 Mar →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	12%	18 Mar →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	23%	21 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.01	3%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	21%	9 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	0%	7 Feb →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	14%	22 Jan →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	18%	17 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jan →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	4%	15 Jan →
dust2	19–17	-0.03	13%	11 Jan →
ancient	13–7	0.04	14%	8 Jan →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	11%	4 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	13%	30 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	21%	26 Dec →
dust2	13–1	0.00	11%	26 Dec →
inferno	16–13	0.01	12%	8 Dec →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	7%	26 Nov →
dust2	13–0	0.09	33%	6 Nov →
dust2	10–13	0.00	22%	13 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.03	19%	2 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	19%	2 Aug →
overpass	13–3	0.09	10%	24 Jul →
overpass	13–5	-0.03	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	16%	20 Jul →
overpass	8–13	-0.00	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	11%	26 May →
mirage	13–8	0.01	15%	9 May →
ancient	13–8	0.04	9%	7 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	26%	31 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	28%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	12%	25 Mar →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	13%	19 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.05	29%	18 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	13%	28 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	18%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.01	24%	20 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	0%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–2	0.06	33%	14 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.04	12%	22 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	32%	23 Sept →
overpass	12–0	0.11	23%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.15	28%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	19%	26 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.03	27%	14 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	0.06	16%	23 Nov →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	14%	23 Nov →
mirage	13–8	-0.07	16%	22 Nov →
nuke	6–13	0.10	20%	20 Nov →
ancient	4–13	0.01	15%	20 Nov →
inferno	8–13	0.07	17%	15 Nov →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	23%	27 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.08	35%	27 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.03	16%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.01	16%	23 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.03	17%	23 Oct →
vertigo	13–8	0.08	13%	23 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	21%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.09	17%	22 Oct →
overpass	6–13	-0.05	9%	16 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.04	12%	16 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.15	26%	16 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	7%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.06	9%	21 Sept →
inferno	2–16	-0.05	10%	20 Sept →
vertigo	5–13	-0.03	19%	15 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	5%	15 Sept →
mirage	4–13	0.03	15%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.06	25%	15 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	17%	14 Sept →
mirage	16–10	0.09	11%	13 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.11	10%	12 Sept →
mirage	16–12	0.06	14%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.10	17%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	13%	12 Sept →