Sheep — CS2 Stats

76561198251305766[U:1:291040038]✓ No bans

1,311Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,934Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3046 of 10716 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheepFACEITLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,934 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning44
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateWLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression5.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.8

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time598ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 27infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA35201557%-0.01
dust2A27171063%-0.01
cacheA27151256%-0.00
infernoC52340%-0.03
nukeC52340%-0.00
ancient1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

388Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
73.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3057%0.9615.0
Dust22462%1.0015.7
Nuke875%1.0415.6
Inferno667%1.1018.7
Overpass333%0.7410.3
Vertigo1100%1.6922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
73.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
604msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
4.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6203% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0823%27 Aug
cache9–13-0.0921%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.038%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0518%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0217%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.046%16 Aug
mirage13–30.0320%16 Aug
cache11–130.0320%15 Aug
mirage13–20.1937%15 Aug
dust213–90.0523%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0326%14 Aug
cache5–13-0.0420%12 Aug
mirage13–10.0010%11 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0026%10 Aug
cache13–6-0.0416%10 Aug
dust213–110.0524%9 Aug
cache13–60.0516%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0419%9 Aug
dust213–7-0.0433%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0424%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0318%8 Aug
dust213–80.0418%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0717%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0429%4 Aug
cache13–1-0.040%4 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0518%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0135%2 Aug
dust211–130.0131%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0232%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0730%1 Aug
inferno4–130.0123%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0833%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.0137%31 Jul
cache13–80.0818%30 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0122%29 Jul
dust216–130.0120%28 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0115%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0023%26 Jul
cache13–70.0222%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0913%23 Jul
cache13–70.0034%22 Jul
dust213–50.0625%21 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0126%19 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0431%18 Jul
cache13–80.0527%18 Jul
cache13–9-0.0317%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0631%15 Jul
dust213–70.0517%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0226%11 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0319%11 Jul
cache10–13-0.0617%10 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0318%9 Jul
cache11–130.0426%8 Jul
dust213–10-0.0313%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0710%2 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0520%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0613%28 Jun
dust213–2-0.0326%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0612%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0819%27 Jun
dust213–7-0.0716%25 Jun
dust213–11-0.0432%30 May
cache13–90.0228%28 May
cache10–13-0.0412%26 May
dust213–1-0.0229%25 May
mirage10–130.1134%23 May
cache13–6-0.0140%20 May
cache0–9-0.0550%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0314%17 May
cache12–12-0.0322%17 May
cache13–100.0035%16 May
cache13–10.0526%14 May
cache6–13-0.0420%13 May
cache4–130.0138%3 May
cache9–20.0433%3 May
cache13–10.0424%2 May
cache5–13-0.0119%28 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0118%26 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0217%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0311%12 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0127%11 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0113%11 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0221%6 Apr
dust213–4-0.0822%5 Apr
dust213–40.0235%5 Apr
mirage13–50.0728%30 Mar
inferno13–100.0116%23 Mar
nuke14–160.0029%18 Mar
dust29–13-0.0123%17 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0329%15 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0413%8 Mar
mirage13–60.0119%6 Mar
mirage13–10.0522%4 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0216%28 Feb
dust29–13-0.0124%27 Feb
dust213–70.0119%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0119%22 Feb
mirage13–40.0628%22 Feb
ancient12–16-0.0318%19 Feb
inferno8–13-0.057%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →