fnf

fnf — CS2 Stats

DE76561198250777828[U:1:290512100]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

666Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,688Purple band · top ~9.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16608 of 39687 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,730 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfnfFACEITLevel 6 · 1,730 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,688 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.2
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time602ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–1
133Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15overpassWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.02
dust2S1511473%0.00
cacheC146843%-0.01
ancientA148657%0.03
infernoC125742%0.05
nukeB84450%0.01
overpassD81713%0.01
anubisA74357%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

171Matches
48%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
86.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4947%1.3018.3
Dust23152%1.2315.1
Ancient1958%1.2018.2
Inferno1856%1.4017.6
Nuke633%1.4915.5
Anubis475%1.0414.3
Train10%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
591msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
6.16HE damage / grenade
14.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0485% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4893 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0712%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0610%13 Jul
cache3–13-0.137%12 Jul
ancient9–130.0217%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.0211%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0216%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0615%12 Jul
dust213–6-0.0128%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0812%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0410%11 Jul
dust20–13-0.0816%11 Jul
ancient13–60.0719%10 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0112%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0213%10 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0312%9 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0110%9 Jul
mirage13–30.1022%9 Jul
cache13–50.0110%9 Jul
dust213–80.038%9 Jul
cache16–120.0911%9 Jul
anubis13–90.044%8 Jul
ancient13–50.057%8 Jul
ancient13–70.039%8 Jul
dust213–30.0613%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0213%5 Jul
inferno9–130.017%5 Jul
inferno15–150.019%4 Jul
mirage15–150.069%20 Jun
cache13–10-0.0313%20 Jun
cache11–13-0.0312%20 Jun
mirage13–11-0.069%20 Jun
cache4–13-0.0512%20 Jun
cache11–8-0.009%19 Jun
cache5–13-0.0116%19 Jun
inferno5–100.0110%19 Jun
cache6–130.0426%19 Jun
cache12–120.0514%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0411%19 Jun
cache13–110.0116%14 Jun
cache12–120.0422%14 Jun
cache13–4-0.0214%14 Jun
overpass8–130.0121%19 Feb
overpass6–90.118%8 Feb
inferno9–10.2212%8 Feb
mirage13–90.0713%1 Feb
dust213–100.0018%1 Feb
dust213–11-0.015%1 Feb
mirage16–140.0215%1 Feb
anubis11–130.0410%31 Jan
nuke13–80.036%31 Jan
mirage12–120.0012%31 Jan
ancient13–8-0.064%31 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0016%31 Jan
ancient6–130.0118%30 Jan
dust216–140.0628%30 Jan
ancient13–30.0911%30 Jan
dust213–110.0212%30 Jan
mirage13–80.0219%30 Jan
nuke13–160.0112%30 Jan
dust211–13-0.0722%30 Jan
nuke13–50.0512%30 Jan
inferno15–150.027%30 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0127%30 Jan
mirage16–130.0812%30 Jan
dust213–90.0520%28 Jan
mirage15–150.0119%28 Jan
ancient11–130.009%28 Jan
dust213–50.0114%28 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0312%28 Jan
dust29–13-0.0313%28 Jan
nuke13–110.1123%28 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0113%27 Jan
inferno14–160.0717%27 Jan
overpass6–130.0013%27 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0311%27 Jan
inferno4–130.0223%27 Jan
dust213–50.1039%27 Jan
overpass13–3-0.048%27 Jan
mirage13–50.0422%27 Jan
inferno13–70.0713%27 Jan
mirage14–160.0717%26 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0313%26 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0413%26 Jan
overpass11–130.0015%26 Jan
inferno13–90.0619%24 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0117%24 Jan
mirage6–130.0317%23 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0221%23 Jan
inferno13–40.0820%22 Jan
dust210–13-0.0321%22 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0212%22 Jan
anubis3–13-0.039%22 Jan
inferno13–50.1019%22 Jan
ancient13–50.0715%22 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0223%20 Jan
overpass8–130.0921%20 Jan
ancient7–130.0314%20 Jan
mirage13–60.0918%20 Jan
anubis13–110.049%20 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0315%20 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →