Haße

Haße — CS2 Stats

DE76561198250424722[U:1:290158994]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

801Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHaßeFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning52
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.7
Utility5.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time571ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 6–0
132Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%0.01
dust2A23131057%0.00
infernoA1610663%0.00
anubisA116555%0.00
ancientB115645%0.00
nukeC83538%0.01
cache43175%0.09
overpass220100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

243Matches
56%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
96.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7860%1.1817.4
Inferno4558%1.3218.3
Anubis3557%1.1418.3
Vertigo3450%1.1117.3
Nuke1839%1.0915.9
Ancient1242%0.9916.0
Overpass967%1.4116.9
Dust22100%1.2015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
562msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
8.69HE damage / grenade
8.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.634% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0126%13 Aug
anubis13–100.0731%13 Aug
anubis13–80.0719%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0820%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0322%8 Aug
dust213–30.1044%8 Aug
dust213–80.0120%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0113%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0320%6 Aug
inferno13–110.1034%6 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0125%5 Aug
inferno9–130.0831%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0325%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0718%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0033%5 Aug
cache13–110.1521%5 Aug
cache13–40.0225%22 Jul
cache13–70.1216%22 Jul
cache11–130.0627%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0029%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0139%10 Apr
dust213–50.0229%10 Apr
anubis15–150.0230%10 Apr
dust213–40.0219%10 Apr
dust216–140.0531%9 Apr
mirage13–50.0526%9 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0618%5 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0224%5 Apr
dust211–130.0224%5 Apr
mirage13–160.0112%4 Apr
mirage13–40.0021%4 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0041%4 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0117%2 Apr
ancient13–70.0019%2 Apr
dust23–13-0.0312%2 Apr
dust213–20.0040%2 Apr
mirage13–100.0314%2 Apr
mirage13–20.0335%2 Apr
ancient8–130.0514%31 Mar
ancient13–30.0228%31 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0423%31 Mar
dust213–100.0119%31 Mar
mirage13–100.0823%30 Mar
ancient0–8-0.0416%30 Mar
dust213–100.1027%30 Mar
ancient13–60.0416%30 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0125%30 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0416%29 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0238%29 Mar
dust211–13-0.0233%29 Mar
inferno13–100.0124%29 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0439%29 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0315%29 Mar
inferno13–40.0336%29 Mar
dust24–13-0.0413%28 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0714%28 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0524%28 Mar
mirage10–130.0427%28 Mar
mirage13–100.0430%28 Mar
dust211–130.0135%28 Mar
nuke6–00.1543%28 Mar
mirage11–130.0321%28 Mar
nuke13–110.0433%26 Mar
inferno22–190.0116%26 Mar
inferno2–13-0.1614%25 Mar
dust216–14-0.0421%25 Mar
dust213–5-0.0429%25 Mar
ancient13–50.0227%25 Mar
mirage9–130.0224%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.045%24 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0511%24 Mar
dust214–16-0.0419%24 Mar
mirage13–20.0022%22 Mar
ancient13–20.0121%22 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0317%22 Mar
dust213–3-0.0132%22 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0215%22 Mar
overpass13–6-0.0614%22 Mar
anubis13–7-0.028%22 Mar
mirage13–80.0517%22 Mar
dust29–13-0.0718%21 Mar
dust24–13-0.0914%21 Mar
inferno13–90.0219%21 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0216%21 Mar
inferno13–50.0027%21 Mar
dust28–130.0121%21 Mar
mirage13–60.1221%21 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0720%20 Mar
inferno10–130.0219%20 Mar
ancient6–130.0222%20 Mar
dust213–80.0514%20 Mar
mirage3–130.0224%20 Mar
inferno16–120.0319%20 Mar
anubis10–130.0523%20 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0210%20 Mar
dust213–10-0.0121%20 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0219%19 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0119%19 Mar
nuke13–60.1131%19 Mar
overpass13–100.0734%19 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →