melty — CS2 Stats

76561198246691386[U:1:286425658]Steam profile ↗

1,949Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,682 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning73

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression10.0

Utility5.7

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning7.3

Utility5.7

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time532ms−86ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy25.1%−5.8%

first ⅓ avg 30.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

13–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 38nukeWeakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	38	27–11	71%	0.03
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	0.04
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.05
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	0.04
nuke	D	5	0–5	0%	0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

774Matches

57%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

88.0ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	85	66%	1.43	19.1
Ancient	52	50%	1.34	18.9
Dust2	46	63%	1.26	18.6
Anubis	31	71%	1.40	20.3
Inferno	17	47%	1.27	18.0
Train	14	64%	1.18	17.5
Overpass	13	46%	1.36	15.9
Nuke	11	73%	1.39	17.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

81.2%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

535msReaction time

36.4%T opening success

63.6%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

7.17HE damage / grenade

12.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	11–13	-0.05	14%	25 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	18%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.12	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	19%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	43%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.15	35%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	26%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	20%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	35%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	21%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.08	35%	3 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.08	22%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	14%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.10	18%	20 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.07	50%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	39%	20 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	26%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.04	14%	20 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.04	34%	20 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.05	21%	19 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	18%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	29%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.23	26%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	13%	19 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.05	27%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.01	28%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–16	0.08	22%	16 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	24%	16 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.01	36%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	21%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.09	58%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.04	29%	15 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	12%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.12	37%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.02	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.07	38%	14 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.03	42%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	14 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	36%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.05	37%	14 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.07	42%	13 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.00	38%	13 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.00	45%	31 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.08	23%	31 May →
ancient	16–14	0.13	30%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.03	21%	31 May →
dust2	13–7	0.05	40%	31 May →
mirage	13–9	0.05	29%	31 May →
overpass	3–13	0.07	32%	31 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	20%	31 May →
inferno	11–13	0.03	37%	30 May →
overpass	13–10	0.04	31%	30 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	41%	25 May →
mirage	15–15	0.09	36%	25 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	39%	24 May →
inferno	6–9	0.02	26%	23 May →
mirage	13–11	0.12	31%	23 May →
mirage	13–11	0.11	32%	23 May →
dust2	9–13	0.05	32%	23 May →
ancient	11–13	0.02	39%	23 May →
dust2	13–10	0.02	21%	23 May →
cache	13–3	0.05	32%	17 May →
mirage	13–7	0.03	23%	17 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	11%	17 May →
overpass	9–13	0.04	29%	17 May →
mirage	13–11	0.04	15%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	37%	28 Apr →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	9%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.02	30%	25 Apr →
dust2	15–15	0.00	39%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.03	33%	25 Apr →
overpass	8–13	0.02	40%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.08	29%	25 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.02	20%	23 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.05	35%	23 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.02	32%	23 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.07	19%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.00	28%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.02	37%	20 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	15%	20 Apr →
dust2	16–12	0.01	37%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.02	27%	18 Apr →
dust2	5–13	0.01	29%	18 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	26%	18 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.02	50%	18 Apr →
overpass	13–9	0.05	33%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.01	19%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.00	21%	12 Apr →
overpass	9–13	0.04	43%	12 Apr →
anubis	13–2	0.13	36%	12 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.01	31%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.12	43%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	62%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–2	0.18	50%	10 Apr →