Pudsy

Pudsy — CS2 Stats

GB76561198246534754[U:1:286269026]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

913Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,422Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3921 of 12578 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPudsyPREMIER22,422 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning52
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54406Last 10054%Win rateLLWTTWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.3
Utility4.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time573ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 9–13
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
82In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB23121152%-0.01
nukeA1710759%0.01
infernoC146843%-0.02
cacheA149564%-0.00
anubisA106460%-0.00
dust2B105550%-0.01
overpassS86275%-0.03
mirage3030%-0.07
vertigo1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

87Matches
62%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2365%0.9913.7
Mirage1953%0.8912.8
Overpass1567%1.0113.4
Ancient1567%1.2015.9
Nuke1050%1.2713.4
Dust2475%1.0819.5
Anubis1100%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
572msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.17HE damage / grenade
6.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1518% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0325%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1020%23 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0540%23 Jul
ancient15–150.0328%23 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0122%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0424%22 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0126%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0120%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0715%19 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0114%19 Jul
cache12–12-0.0018%16 Jul
ancient13–110.0319%16 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0110%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0313%14 Jul
anubis13–90.0912%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.0011%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0832%13 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0412%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0121%13 Jul
nuke13–20.0512%13 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%11 Jul
dust28–130.0013%11 Jul
cache13–6-0.0527%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0316%10 Jul
ancient13–40.0619%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.0114%10 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0225%10 Jul
vertigo0–13-0.076%10 Jul
dust213–50.0116%10 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0518%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0718%10 Jul
dust213–30.0119%9 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0214%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0823%9 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0319%9 Jul
cache13–11-0.0117%9 Jul
inferno13–110.0212%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0024%24 Jun
anubis13–100.0219%24 Jun
ancient13–40.0414%23 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0213%23 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0114%23 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0221%23 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0416%23 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0014%23 Jun
cache13–9-0.0513%24 May
ancient10–130.0210%24 May
dust213–7-0.0929%24 May
nuke13–80.0231%24 May
nuke13–40.0315%17 May
nuke13–1-0.0116%11 May
nuke13–60.0210%11 May
anubis13–80.0015%11 May
ancient9–13-0.0018%11 May
overpass13–11-0.0216%6 May
ancient13–10-0.0416%6 May
inferno7–13-0.099%6 May
cache8–130.019%3 May
cache9–130.1615%3 May
cache8–1-0.048%3 May
cache10–13-0.0221%3 May
nuke15–150.0722%3 May
ancient6–130.0325%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0025%3 May
inferno13–8-0.0419%3 May
inferno8–130.0014%30 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0820%30 Apr
cache13–80.0428%30 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0225%29 Apr
nuke13–40.0317%29 Apr
anubis13–5-0.0224%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.0121%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0018%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0117%29 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0417%28 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0216%28 Apr
dust27–13-0.0614%16 Apr
overpass13–80.0119%16 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0421%16 Apr
nuke13–20.0819%16 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0421%16 Apr
dust213–70.0521%16 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0319%23 Mar
overpass13–7-0.049%23 Mar
mirage4–13-0.107%23 Mar
ancient13–10-0.054%14 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0413%14 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0117%12 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0222%12 Mar
ancient10–13-0.1118%12 Mar
dust213–00.026%3 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0815%3 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0415%21 Feb
dust28–13-0.0127%21 Feb
overpass3–1-0.0925%21 Feb
nuke10–130.047%5 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0317%5 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0323%1 Feb
ancient12–120.0716%1 Feb
inferno16–130.0115%29 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →