Dubz

Dubz — CS2 Stats

76561198237860070[U:1:277594342]Steam profile ↗

1,280Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 Solid
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDubzFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning69
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression9.3
Utility7.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning6.9
Utility7.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time580ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34181653%0.01
infernoC156940%0.00
dust2C135838%-0.00
nukeS139469%0.01
anubisD113827%-0.02
overpassC73443%-0.01
cache41325%-0.01
ancient31233%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

216Matches
48%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5358%1.0514.4
Dust22454%1.1115.8
Inferno2133%0.7811.8
Anubis1567%1.1614.0
Vertigo1443%1.0014.9
Ancient1331%0.8013.0
Nuke825%0.7512.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
64.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
12.69HE damage / grenade
19.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.037%24 Aug
anubis16–130.0214%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0015%23 Aug
mirage8–130.0616%13 Aug
cache13–110.0112%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0115%12 Aug
dust23–130.0334%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0213%11 Aug
inferno13–40.0523%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0520%29 Jun
inferno9–130.0123%24 Jun
mirage13–70.1019%23 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0316%23 Jun
mirage12–160.0125%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0123%21 Jun
dust213–80.0414%21 Jun
anubis13–40.0011%21 Jun
nuke13–90.0710%20 Jun
overpass13–70.0119%20 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0512%19 Jun
inferno11–130.0215%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0221%17 Jun
inferno9–70.0522%16 Jun
nuke13–110.0515%16 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0220%14 Jun
anubis13–40.0418%14 Jun
inferno13–90.0316%12 Jun
nuke13–80.0111%11 Jun
inferno6–2-0.0214%11 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0323%10 Jun
mirage13–50.0931%9 Jun
overpass13–110.0824%9 Jun
nuke6–13-0.037%8 Jun
dust215–15-0.0225%7 Jun
mirage13–70.0320%7 Jun
cache6–13-0.0125%6 Jun
nuke13–2-0.0113%4 Jun
inferno13–50.0023%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.027%2 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0224%28 May
mirage13–60.0114%28 May
mirage13–70.0311%28 May
mirage10–130.0116%27 May
overpass5–13-0.0822%27 May
inferno10–13-0.0637%26 May
mirage13–60.0417%26 May
anubis7–130.0224%25 May
mirage3–13-0.0718%25 May
ancient11–13-0.0411%25 May
mirage9–130.0516%25 May
overpass7–13-0.0718%23 May
dust215–15-0.0131%23 May
inferno8–13-0.0324%23 May
mirage13–80.0525%23 May
inferno7–13-0.046%22 May
mirage10–13-0.0115%22 May
inferno9–130.0130%21 May
mirage13–70.0335%20 May
dust213–11-0.026%20 May
ancient11–13-0.0323%9 May
dust213–60.0826%9 May
mirage13–60.0524%6 May
nuke13–80.0317%6 May
mirage8–13-0.0224%6 May
inferno13–110.0222%5 May
cache8–13-0.0518%5 May
nuke8–13-0.0621%4 May
mirage13–30.0625%4 May
dust29–13-0.0421%4 May
mirage13–60.0119%1 May
inferno9–130.0418%1 May
nuke13–80.0615%30 Apr
mirage13–100.0431%30 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0117%30 Apr
mirage13–40.0421%30 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0422%29 Apr
dust213–16-0.0018%28 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0013%28 Apr
dust29–13-0.0821%28 Apr
mirage11–130.0115%28 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0216%27 Apr
nuke13–80.0318%27 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0937%27 Apr
dust26–13-0.0717%27 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0115%26 Apr
overpass16–140.0317%26 Apr
anubis9–13-0.029%26 Apr
dust213–70.0016%26 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0019%23 Apr
mirage15–150.0217%23 Apr
dust25–130.0526%22 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0316%22 Apr
anubis11–130.0318%22 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0417%22 Apr
inferno3–9-0.0113%22 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0312%20 Apr
dust213–9-0.0026%20 Apr
anubis9–13-0.069%19 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0522%19 Apr
mirage13–11-0.018%18 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →