Hoxxc — CS2 Stats

76561198237449926[U:1:277184198]✓ No bans

1,218Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 Developing

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45

Positioning55

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–42–10Last 10048%Win rateWWLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5

Aggression5.6

Utility6.6

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 44% on T to 25% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5

Positioning5.5

Utility6.6

Mechanics5.2

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.06

Reaction time662ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 61mirageWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	61	33–28	54%	0.04
cache	B	18	9–9	50%	0.03
mirage	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.08
office	—	3	0–3	0%	0.07
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.11
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy

32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.6%Spray accuracy

73.5%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

669msReaction time

43.9%T opening success

24.8%CT opening success

0.79Enemies flashed / flash

16.1%Flash assists

17.47HE damage / grenade

6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 24.8195% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	-0.01	10%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	14%	29 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.03	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	12%	21 Aug →
inferno	6–9	0.09	15%	16 Aug →
vertigo	9–1	0.21	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	24%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.12	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.18	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	6%	30 Jul →
boulder	13–10	0.06	9%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.00	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.07	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.15	22%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.10	13%	22 Jul →
office	12–12	0.06	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.10	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	29%	9 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.13	22%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.15	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	12%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.07	21%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.16	17%	22 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	23%	16 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.12	15%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.06	14%	14 Jun →
office	7–13	0.04	22%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.07	14%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.09	19%	12 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.08	10%	30 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	14%	30 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	15%	30 May →
dust2	4–13	0.01	10%	26 May →
inferno	15–15	0.09	11%	25 May →
nuke	9–13	0.02	12%	25 May →
dust2	3–13	0.00	18%	25 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	6%	24 May →
nuke	5–9	-0.06	15%	24 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	13%	24 May →
cache	13–2	0.13	17%	24 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	18%	24 May →
dust2	7–13	0.04	12%	22 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	20%	20 May →
cache	7–13	-0.03	15%	20 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	18%	19 May →
dust2	6–7	0.04	9%	15 May →
dust2	13–8	0.06	13%	15 May →
cache	10–1	0.14	31%	14 May →
cache	13–9	0.07	18%	13 May →
dust2	13–4	0.25	18%	13 May →
dust2	13–7	0.11	18%	9 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	22%	9 May →
ancient	6–13	0.01	26%	9 May →
cache	13–8	0.06	14%	6 May →
dust2	13–8	0.09	28%	6 May →
office	12–12	0.11	20%	4 May →
cache	12–12	0.08	17%	4 May →
dust2	12–12	0.13	13%	3 May →
cache	13–3	0.04	14%	1 May →
cache	6–13	-0.00	11%	30 Apr →
cache	9–13	0.01	12%	30 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.02	10%	30 Apr →
cache	8–13	-0.03	12%	30 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.05	28%	29 Apr →
cache	9–13	-0.03	19%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	-0.08	20%	29 Apr →
cache	13–6	0.02	13%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.03	16%	28 Apr →
overpass	10–13	0.00	22%	28 Apr →
dust2	5–13	0.05	22%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.09	16%	28 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	29%	27 Apr →
dust2	7–5	-0.07	29%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.07	18%	27 Apr →
mirage	3–13	0.00	16%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.11	15%	25 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	27%	22 Apr →
overpass	15–15	0.04	24%	22 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.05	17%	21 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.00	17%	21 Apr →
dust2	6–13	0.06	19%	21 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.02	20%	21 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.09	28%	21 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	9%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.03	11%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–1	0.05	18%	19 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.02	15%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.06	28%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.05	22%	18 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.07	19%	17 Apr →
overpass	13–3	-0.01	30%	17 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.05	21%	15 Apr →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	19%	14 Apr →