PugChomp — CS2 Stats

76561198237057184[U:1:276791456]

446Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating16,523Purple band · top ~22.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9851 of 16418 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPugChompPREMIER16,523 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning31
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6
Aggression1.3
Utility6.8
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning3.1
Utility6.8
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time617ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy10.5%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–11
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
149In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC27101737%-0.02
mirageA27161159%-0.01
anubisS128467%-0.01
infernoD81713%-0.05
cacheD72529%-0.03
dust2A74357%-0.04
overpassS75271%0.01
nukeA53260%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.4%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
68.8%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
619msReaction time
17.4%T opening success
23.3%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.92HE damage / grenade
18.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.4252% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.4098% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.058%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0312%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0812%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.036%19 Aug
ancient3–130.0115%19 Aug
ancient14–160.0119%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1012%18 Aug
ancient16–14-0.078%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.016%18 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0419%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.009%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.038%13 Aug
anubis9–13-0.026%13 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0411%21 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0514%21 Jul
inferno1–13-0.095%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0413%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.034%20 Jul
cache5–13-0.0910%20 Jul
cache13–110.0015%9 Jul
inferno13–8-0.029%9 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0510%9 Jul
inferno1–7-0.090%9 Jul
mirage13–70.0418%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.046%6 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0515%4 Jul
dust213–11-0.0511%3 Jul
ancient13–11-0.073%3 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0111%2 Jul
anubis5–13-0.069%2 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0418%2 Jul
ancient8–13-0.096%2 Jul
dust213–10-0.0819%2 Jul
ancient13–11-0.015%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0216%30 Jun
overpass5–13-0.058%30 Jun
overpass16–12-0.0310%30 Jun
ancient13–110.0310%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.0411%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0420%30 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0217%18 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0622%18 Jun
overpass13–50.0412%18 Jun
ancient11–130.034%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0112%18 Jun
ancient11–130.0114%17 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0410%17 Jun
mirage13–6-0.013%16 Jun
anubis13–8-0.057%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0111%16 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0212%16 Jun
dust28–13-0.110%15 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0824%15 Jun
nuke13–7-0.045%15 Jun
mirage13–30.1010%12 Jun
dust213–11-0.0127%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.034%12 Jun
mirage13–11-0.057%12 Jun
mirage6–130.0015%12 Jun
dust216–13-0.0219%11 Jun
mirage13–8-0.066%11 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0210%11 Jun
anubis13–20.0914%11 Jun
ancient9–13-0.052%11 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0625%10 Jun
ancient10–20.0315%10 Jun
mirage13–100.0310%10 Jun
anubis13–90.0220%10 Jun
mirage7–13-0.084%10 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0314%10 Jun
anubis15–150.0021%10 Jun
overpass13–40.096%10 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0217%10 Jun
overpass9–130.0027%9 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0111%9 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0216%9 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0523%8 Jun
mirage8–130.028%6 Jun
ancient11–13-0.073%6 Jun
ancient13–110.1119%6 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0117%6 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0623%5 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0214%29 May
inferno13–16-0.089%29 May
ancient7–13-0.0214%29 May
mirage3–13-0.058%29 May
mirage13–11-0.0212%28 May
mirage13–10.0719%28 May
cache9–130.039%28 May
cache12–12-0.049%28 May
cache5–13-0.0611%28 May
mirage13–100.0612%10 Nov
overpass13–40.0910%10 Nov
dust26–130.0217%10 Nov
ancient12–12-0.036%10 Nov
mirage10–130.007%29 Oct
inferno9–13-0.0614%29 Oct
ancient13–90.0513%29 Oct
mirage11–130.029%29 Oct
overpass13–11-0.0513%29 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →