SenorGob

SenorGob — CS2 Stats

76561198234160408[U:1:273894680]Steam profile ↗

1,656Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidEntry Fragger
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,797 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSenorGobFACEITLevel 9 · 1,797 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning66
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.1
Aggression10.0
Utility5.9
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 71% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 71% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time522ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 27anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36211558%0.02
mirageA27161159%0.03
anubisD93633%-0.00
ancientA95456%0.02
infernoD93633%0.01
cacheC73443%0.00
nuke32167%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

467Matches
50%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
95.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15150%1.4719.9
Dust210453%1.4519.8
Ancient4856%1.3119.9
Inferno3546%1.2018.1
Nuke2934%1.4019.6
Anubis1861%1.2717.5
Cache850%1.0616.3
Overpass60%0.6710.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.9%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
513msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
70.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.33HE damage / grenade
10.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9542% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0418%22 Aug
dust212–20.0541%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0218%19 Aug
dust213–90.0633%19 Aug
dust28–130.0631%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.0428%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0231%17 Aug
dust213–80.0430%17 Aug
cache13–160.0514%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0023%5 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0111%5 Aug
dust213–4-0.0419%31 Jul
mirage13–40.0611%31 Jul
cache13–80.0915%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.0329%29 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0121%28 Jun
cache9–13-0.0614%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0814%10 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0233%1 Jun
mirage13–100.0422%29 May
dust213–70.0616%3 May
dust27–130.0123%3 May
dust213–9-0.0026%3 May
dust212–120.1235%3 May
dust27–13-0.0831%3 May
cache13–5-0.0233%3 May
anubis8–130.0116%1 May
anubis11–130.0819%1 May
nuke13–9-0.0129%1 May
dust29–130.0423%1 May
mirage13–50.0524%1 May
dust213–100.0515%1 May
dust29–13-0.0027%1 May
anubis16–120.0014%1 May
dust24–13-0.0433%1 May
cache8–13-0.1031%30 Apr
mirage13–50.0928%30 Apr
cache16–130.0124%29 Apr
mirage13–10.1257%28 Apr
ancient11–13-0.094%27 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0216%27 Apr
inferno13–90.0814%22 Apr
dust28–13-0.0319%22 Apr
ancient7–130.0325%21 Apr
ancient13–110.0729%20 Apr
dust213–8-0.0116%19 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0240%19 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0714%19 Apr
ancient11–130.0420%19 Apr
dust213–6-0.0121%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0318%19 Apr
dust210–130.0634%18 Apr
ancient16–130.0515%18 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0418%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0016%17 Apr
inferno10–130.0714%17 Apr
mirage12–120.0618%17 Apr
inferno7–130.0610%16 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0213%16 Apr
dust213–50.0533%15 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0016%15 Apr
mirage13–60.1219%15 Apr
dust213–110.0353%14 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0223%14 Apr
mirage13–70.0250%14 Apr
mirage4–130.0330%14 Apr
dust213–40.0550%14 Apr
mirage4–130.0060%14 Apr
dust27–13-0.0243%14 Apr
dust212–12-0.0328%14 Apr
dust213–60.0444%14 Apr
anubis13–0-0.0210%14 Apr
inferno6–13-0.008%14 Apr
mirage6–130.0515%14 Apr
dust219–170.0217%14 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0418%14 Apr
dust213–10-0.0112%14 Apr
dust213–50.2024%13 Apr
inferno13–110.0412%13 Apr
anubis13–50.0517%13 Apr
ancient13–30.0315%12 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0316%12 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0121%12 Apr
mirage7–130.0119%12 Apr
dust210–4-0.0127%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0922%12 Apr
mirage13–80.1125%12 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0515%12 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0015%12 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0413%12 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0118%12 Apr
mirage13–80.0519%12 Apr
dust213–11-0.0310%12 Apr
ancient13–100.0516%12 Apr
dust213–90.1021%12 Apr
dust210–130.0221%11 Apr
dust213–80.1017%11 Apr
mirage13–100.0313%11 Apr
dust213–90.0021%11 Apr
inferno13–30.0317%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →