hardcore world of warcraft — CS2 Stats

76561198221172124[U:1:260906396]

468Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,855Purple band · top ~25% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20750 of 35340 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhardcore world of warcraftFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,855 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning63
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression9.6
Utility5.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch6.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time563ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–5
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 12anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB42222052%0.04
nukeB147750%0.04
dust2A127558%0.04
cacheA95456%0.03
ancientC83538%0.04
anubisD82625%0.04
infernoB63350%-0.01
overpass1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

237Matches
51%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
94.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1669%1.7322.0
Inferno633%1.3615.0
Nuke633%0.9615.0
Dust2633%1.0314.5
Cache333%1.2827.0
Anubis20%1.0817.5
Ancient20%0.8013.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
577msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
10.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9045% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0416%29 Aug
dust211–130.1027%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.048%29 Aug
ancient13–50.0818%29 Aug
nuke13–110.0215%27 Aug
ancient8–3-0.048%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0214%23 Aug
cache13–90.0229%23 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0313%22 Aug
nuke8–130.0825%21 Aug
cache13–160.0113%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0521%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0222%3 Aug
dust213–100.0122%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0315%3 Aug
nuke13–60.0024%3 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0416%3 Aug
mirage12–160.0612%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0218%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0414%2 Aug
mirage0–20.000%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0616%31 Jul
dust23–80.1022%31 Jul
mirage13–10.1418%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0215%31 Jul
mirage9–130.1318%30 Jul
mirage13–40.0322%30 Jul
mirage13–80.1526%30 Jul
nuke13–90.0311%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0122%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0725%29 Jul
cache17–190.0512%27 Jul
inferno16–130.0520%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0914%25 Jul
cache11–130.0118%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.052%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0326%22 Jul
nuke7–130.0418%21 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0015%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0014%21 Jul
mirage9–130.0613%20 Jul
ancient9–130.0212%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0511%20 Jul
dust213–110.0112%20 Jul
anubis11–130.0418%19 Jul
nuke5–130.0221%19 Jul
mirage8–130.0126%19 Jul
inferno0–9-0.1725%19 Jul
dust213–50.1120%19 Jul
anubis9–130.0114%17 Jul
nuke13–30.0922%17 Jul
mirage15–150.0415%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0438%17 Jul
cache13–50.0921%17 Jul
nuke13–60.0525%16 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0017%16 Jul
ancient13–160.0824%16 Jul
dust213–7-0.0212%15 Jul
inferno13–40.0619%15 Jul
cache13–1-0.0323%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0227%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0131%15 Jul
cache13–50.0617%15 Jul
ancient13–70.1523%15 Jul
cache13–00.0857%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0213%15 Jul
mirage13–90.0320%14 Jul
anubis13–90.1018%14 Jul
dust213–100.1127%14 Jul
mirage8–130.1030%14 Jul
cache15–150.0123%13 Jul
ancient11–130.0010%13 Jul
mirage13–30.0225%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0436%9 Jul
mirage6–130.0412%5 Jul
nuke10–130.1022%5 Jul
anubis9–130.0523%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0223%5 Jul
nuke13–70.0822%5 Jul
ancient3–130.0125%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0613%5 Jul
dust213–110.1124%5 Jul
anubis11–130.0523%3 Jul
mirage13–50.1918%3 Jul
mirage13–100.0320%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0413%2 Jul
mirage13–50.1410%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0224%1 Jul
mirage8–130.0616%1 Jul
nuke6–130.019%1 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0111%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0525%28 Jun
mirage12–60.0219%28 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0223%28 Jun
inferno13–80.0625%27 Jun
mirage13–110.1424%26 Jun
nuke13–90.0322%26 Jun
overpass4–130.0131%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.0324%25 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0817%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →