Vulpes

Vulpes — CS2 Stats

US76561198218985796[U:1:258720068]Steam profile ↗

1,791Tracked matches65%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,675Purple band · top ~21.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12306 of 21058 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,675Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,675
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,325 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVulpesPREMIER16,675 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLWLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.3
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time555ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy13.9%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — shelter 13–11
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2091145%0.03
nukeD1441029%-0.02
anubisC125742%-0.01
dust2C125742%-0.01
ancientA127558%0.00
infernoA106460%-0.02
cacheA74357%-0.01
overpassA53260%0.03
vertigo3030%-0.03
boulder32167%0.00
shelter110100%0.19
fachwerk110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

158Matches
54%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
81.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2969%1.1316.8
Inferno1861%0.8314.2
Nuke1258%1.1716.9
Overpass825%0.8013.1
Anubis850%1.0015.8
Ancient7100%1.0015.6
Vertigo475%0.7812.0
Cache425%1.0417.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
549msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
4.85HE damage / grenade
7.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7807% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9437% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0111%16 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0115%16 Aug
cache2–13-0.0426%16 Aug
anubis13–70.0510%16 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0310%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0411%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0317%15 Aug
dust22–13-0.0819%15 Aug
cache13–80.0116%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0218%10 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0514%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.087%9 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0217%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.0212%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0414%8 Aug
overpass13–40.1512%8 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0516%8 Aug
inferno3–130.0218%8 Aug
nuke10–4-0.0118%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0110%8 Aug
dust213–9-0.0810%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0225%8 Aug
boulder13–60.0610%7 Aug
boulder13–10-0.0212%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0213%7 Aug
cache12–120.0011%4 Aug
anubis16–140.0213%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0313%3 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0316%3 Aug
nuke13–70.016%3 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0116%27 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0113%27 Jul
cache13–4-0.038%27 Jul
cache11–130.0118%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0611%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0011%26 Jul
nuke6–130.0620%20 Jul
boulder3–13-0.0418%12 Jul
shelter13–110.1921%12 Jul
fachwerk6–3-0.0118%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0613%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0119%11 Jul
inferno6–130.0429%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0614%11 Jul
inferno13–70.0515%11 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0212%3 Jul
overpass13–50.059%3 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0019%3 Jul
dust213–60.0720%3 Jul
nuke13–20.0829%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0110%2 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0329%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0313%30 Jun
dust29–130.0216%30 Jun
mirage13–40.0515%30 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0225%30 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0314%29 Jun
dust213–80.0213%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0612%28 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0317%28 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0313%16 Jun
anubis13–90.0213%16 Jun
ancient13–80.0115%16 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0420%13 Jun
dust213–20.0521%13 Jun
mirage13–80.0617%13 Jun
ancient13–160.0115%13 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0111%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.076%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.034%12 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0217%12 Jun
mirage10–130.0917%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0612%11 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0119%8 Jun
cache13–11-0.0018%4 Jun
mirage11–130.0418%4 Jun
dust27–13-0.0216%4 Jun
overpass10–13-0.008%1 Jun
ancient11–130.0016%1 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0324%1 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0417%1 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0210%12 May
mirage11–130.0515%12 May
anubis9–13-0.0114%12 May
mirage11–130.0719%12 May
nuke7–13-0.0512%11 May
ancient13–160.0714%11 May
nuke4–13-0.076%11 May
dust210–130.0313%10 May
dust210–13-0.028%10 May
nuke9–13-0.077%10 May
anubis8–13-0.0613%10 May
nuke12–16-0.0115%10 May
mirage13–60.0725%10 May
mirage5–130.0517%10 May
ancient13–100.0114%10 May
inferno13–11-0.0314%10 May
mirage3–130.0120%10 May
dust216–13-0.0320%9 May
anubis9–13-0.0221%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →