BIG CHARLYYY — CS2 Stats

76561198217693525[U:1:257427797]

1,110Tracked matches44%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating18,525Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3507 of 6668 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,525Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,525
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,475 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBIG CHARLYYYFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER18,525 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning43
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateLWTLTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim3.7
Aggression2.6
Utility7.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 56% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning4.3
Utility7.3
Mechanics1.4
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact3.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time535ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy8.6%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 10.4% → last ⅓ avg 8.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — cache
9Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.02
ancientA1610663%-0.04
infernoB158753%-0.01
cacheA159660%-0.02
mirageC146843%-0.01
anubisC104640%0.02
nukeB84450%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
17%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
57.1ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%0.609.0
Mirage10%0.152.0
Inferno10%0.365.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.6%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
56.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
529msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.80HE damage / grenade
15.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.641% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5738% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.004%24 Aug
mirage13–60.068%24 Aug
inferno15–15-0.025%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.114%24 Aug
cache12–12-0.0412%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.0819%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0612%15 Aug
anubis13–40.0716%15 Aug
cache13–50.0618%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.048%15 Aug
mirage13–80.043%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.069%15 Aug
anubis9–13-0.043%15 Aug
dust216–130.029%15 Aug
dust28–130.0312%15 Aug
mirage3–13-0.079%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.0310%15 Aug
inferno2–13-0.095%14 Aug
mirage7–130.0211%14 Aug
cache13–110.0119%14 Aug
anubis14–16-0.045%13 Aug
nuke5–13-0.108%12 Aug
nuke4–13-0.126%12 Aug
dust213–40.026%11 Aug
cache15–15-0.0610%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.045%10 Aug
dust213–3-0.018%9 Aug
anubis3–13-0.037%9 Aug
ancient4–13-0.090%9 Aug
anubis13–16-0.038%9 Aug
mirage2–13-0.073%9 Aug
inferno6–130.029%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0611%9 Aug
ancient11–130.035%6 Aug
cache13–10.019%6 Aug
cache13–4-0.0218%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0511%2 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0513%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0516%1 Aug
ancient11–8-0.053%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0428%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.036%1 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0518%1 Aug
anubis13–80.1014%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0414%26 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0414%26 Jul
cache3–13-0.0218%26 Jul
ancient16–13-0.058%24 Jul
ancient13–90.059%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.0412%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.0215%24 Jul
anubis5–130.044%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.019%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0812%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.046%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0116%19 Jul
dust27–130.0024%19 Jul
anubis1–100.0124%19 Jul
anubis7–1-0.0129%19 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0413%19 Jul
dust213–40.0212%18 Jul
cache13–70.055%18 Jul
inferno13–80.048%18 Jul
dust213–30.1116%18 Jul
dust213–40.006%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.068%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0423%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0021%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0216%17 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0123%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.093%17 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0012%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0413%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.017%12 Jul
dust20–13-0.0617%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0513%12 Jul
cache16–13-0.0312%12 Jul
anubis13–10.115%12 Jul
nuke13–30.013%12 Jul
inferno13–8-0.058%12 Jul
inferno13–30.127%12 Jul
dust213–6-0.060%12 Jul
nuke13–50.013%11 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0010%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.058%11 Jul
nuke16–140.026%11 Jul
nuke13–6-0.013%11 Jul
nuke4–13-0.100%11 Jul
cache13–7-0.0510%11 Jul
dust214–16-0.0710%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0012%11 Jul
mirage9–130.0116%10 Jul
ancient13–9-0.054%10 Jul
nuke1–11-0.0736%10 Jul
inferno14–160.0115%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0710%10 Jul
ancient13–9-0.055%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.017%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0325%9 Jul
cache13–4-0.036%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →