Manetti — CS2 Stats

DE76561198215991835[U:1:255726107]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,058Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating19,496Purple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8820 of 18766 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,496Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,496
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 504 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning44

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLLWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression5.5

Utility6.5

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.4

Utility6.5

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time633ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms

Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — cache 13–5

13–0Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	33	17–16	52%	-0.01
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.00
inferno	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.04
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.02
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

218Matches

51%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

73.1ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	12	58%	0.89	14.2
Mirage	5	60%	1.18	10.2
Nuke	5	80%	0.99	15.6
Ancient	3	33%	0.79	10.0
Inferno	2	50%	1.02	16.0
Overpass	1	100%	0.88	15.0
Vertigo	1	0%	1.06	17.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.79	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.1%Spray accuracy

76.7%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

641msReaction time

23.2%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

10.71HE damage / grenade

8.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	6–13	-0.07	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	9%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	20%	26 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	8%	24 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.01	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	21%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	26%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	13%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	8%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	12%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	42%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	28%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.07	25%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	10%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	19%	22 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.00	22%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.03	18%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	16%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	7%	21 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.00	12%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	16%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	23%	20 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	17%	19 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.00	22%	18 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.09	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	15%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	22%	15 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	11%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	36%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	21%	14 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	17%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	6%	13 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	16%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	27%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	11%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–11	-0.00	20%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	15%	8 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	19%	8 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.05	21%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.02	17%	8 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	18%	7 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	10%	7 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	6%	7 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	8%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	11%	6 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	17%	3 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	18%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	19%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	12%	3 Jul →
mirage	2–9	-0.01	31%	3 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	9%	3 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	13%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	20%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	34%	3 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	13%	2 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	15%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	12%	1 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	30%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	14%	1 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	7%	28 Jun →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	14%	26 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.00	14%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.00	10%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.01	24%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	14%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.05	8%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–2	-0.07	3%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	18%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	16%	24 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.02	16%	23 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	14%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	18%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	7%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	22 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.00	16%	22 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	14%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.02	14%	21 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	14%	20 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.01	15%	20 Jun →
inferno	3–0	-0.05	0%	20 Jun →
mirage	0–8	0.04	25%	18 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.04	14%	18 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	13%	17 Jun →