OPELAMPERAE — CS2 Stats

76561198213666743[U:1:253401015]

3,406Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,216 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOPELAMPERAEFACEITLevel 9 · 1,216 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning47
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49492Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression4.3
Utility4.6
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.7
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time535ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–3
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%0.00
infernoC1871139%0.02
nukeA169756%0.04
dust2S1511473%0.00
ancientA138562%0.01
anubisD113827%0.02
cache43175%0.01
overpass2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,402Matches
49%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31447%1.0514.8
Ancient20447%1.0714.5
Inferno18746%1.0815.0
Anubis18148%1.0915.5
Nuke17853%1.0915.9
Dust216446%0.9914.3
Vertigo6761%1.2215.2
Overpass3540%1.0814.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
536msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
11.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8739% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.0128%27 Aug
ancient0–11-0.0711%25 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0010%24 Aug
ancient13–60.1020%23 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0425%22 Aug
cache13–5-0.0216%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0916%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%10 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0214%10 Aug
anubis13–70.086%9 Aug
nuke13–100.0211%9 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0211%9 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0210%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0116%8 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0813%5 Aug
inferno10–130.0519%5 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0714%21 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0317%20 Jul
dust213–11-0.0238%19 Jul
dust217–190.0017%19 Jul
anubis13–40.0718%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0020%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0615%3 Jul
dust213–110.0212%25 Jun
inferno13–80.0212%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0320%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0018%21 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0424%21 Jun
mirage13–40.0312%21 Jun
inferno12–160.1025%9 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0315%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0827%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0725%7 Jun
cache16–130.0124%5 Jun
anubis9–130.0015%4 Jun
mirage10–130.0320%4 Jun
nuke7–130.0519%3 Jun
nuke9–130.0419%3 Jun
mirage11–130.0220%2 Jun
dust213–100.0522%2 Jun
nuke13–40.0919%2 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0221%2 Jun
nuke13–50.1218%2 Jun
inferno14–160.0217%2 Jun
inferno8–130.0811%31 May
nuke13–10-0.0319%31 May
dust213–160.0217%29 May
inferno15–15-0.0219%29 May
cache11–130.0018%28 May
mirage13–40.0524%26 May
anubis7–130.1118%24 May
mirage10–130.0318%23 May
nuke22–180.0522%23 May
nuke13–30.1538%14 May
dust213–6-0.0523%12 May
nuke13–8-0.0115%11 May
mirage9–130.0218%3 May
nuke9–13-0.0321%2 May
ancient13–8-0.0010%2 May
cache13–100.0320%1 May
mirage16–12-0.0216%30 Apr
inferno13–20.0717%30 Apr
mirage13–30.0422%30 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0214%22 Apr
mirage13–11-0.018%16 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0014%16 Apr
ancient13–30.1112%16 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0221%15 Apr
inferno13–10.0815%15 Apr
dust211–13-0.0213%15 Apr
dust213–70.048%15 Apr
mirage3–130.0020%15 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0110%14 Apr
dust219–170.0517%20 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0517%20 Mar
dust213–90.0414%20 Mar
mirage13–20.1513%20 Mar
nuke11–130.0623%20 Mar
dust213–50.0214%18 Mar
ancient13–16-0.009%16 Mar
mirage10–13-0.1013%2 Mar
inferno11–130.0422%1 Mar
anubis16–130.0214%28 Feb
anubis7–130.1017%28 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0118%28 Feb
ancient8–130.0025%27 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0317%27 Feb
nuke13–00.1317%27 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0124%26 Feb
dust213–9-0.0121%26 Feb
nuke12–16-0.0423%26 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0520%2 Feb
inferno10–13-0.049%2 Feb
mirage4–60.0425%2 Feb
dust213–8-0.0219%19 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0212%19 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0316%19 Jan
nuke8–130.008%19 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0616%18 Jan
dust213–100.0214%15 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →