alex — CS2 Stats

76561198211315147[U:1:251049419]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

490Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,796Purple band · top ~21.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10111 of 17185 tracked

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning57

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWWLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4

Aggression9.7

Utility4.0

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning5.7

Utility4.0

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time616ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms

Headshot accuracy14.8%−5.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–2

13–0Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 31% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	26	8–18	31%	0.01
mirage	B	24	12–12	50%	-0.00
cache	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.04
inferno	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.01
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.06
anubis	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.13
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches

43%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

80.2ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win

11%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	11	73%	1.08	17.2
Dust2	11	36%	1.07	14.7
Anubis	6	0%	0.78	14.8
Cache	4	75%	1.28	18.0
Nuke	4	0%	0.98	17.5
Inferno	4	50%	1.18	14.5
Vertigo	1	100%	0.82	9.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.40	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy

42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.8%Spray accuracy

83.9%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

613msReaction time

35.4%T opening success

60.5%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

7.97HE damage / grenade

8.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.4131% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–6	0.09	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.13	21%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	10%	12 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.07	15%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	5%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	13%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.05	9%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	12%	4 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	11%	4 Aug →
inferno	1–5	-0.03	0%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.08	13%	3 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.21	32%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	13%	2 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	18%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	38%	2 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.02	12%	2 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.10	24%	1 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	19%	31 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.10	8%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	7%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	16%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.08	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.11	13%	30 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	4%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	10%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	24%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	20%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	22%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	18%	27 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.05	13%	27 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.03	34%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	6%	26 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.05	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.05	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.01	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	8%	26 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.04	30%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	24%	24 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.02	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	0–2	0.07	40%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.10	15%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	23%	23 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.04	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.02	19%	22 Jul →
cache	2–11	-0.02	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	19%	22 Jul →
office	12–12	-0.01	31%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.01	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.15	25%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	19–15	-0.01	23%	19 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	19%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	12%	17 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	21%	17 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.01	12%	17 Jul →
cache	9–1	-0.02	18%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	36%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	9%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	37%	13 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	16%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.03	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	20%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	23%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	18%	12 Jul →
shelter	9–13	0.13	42%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–3	0.01	21%	8 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	26%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.12	40%	8 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	15%	8 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	16%	6 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	11%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.11	27%	2 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.03	14%	2 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.08	15%	2 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	15%	1 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.06	15%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.11	17%	1 Jul →