AlbusPercivalBrianDumbledore — CS2 Stats

76561198210965827[U:1:250700099]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

963Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,868 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning50

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression4.4

Utility4.9

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.0

Utility4.9

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time583ms−84ms

first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy14.1%−5.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 4–0

13–1Biggest win — overpass

6Longest win streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	37	17–20	46%	0.00
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	0.02
nuke	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.02
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

858Matches

52%Win rate

0.92Avg K/D

68.1ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	108	53%	0.82	12.9
Ancient	63	54%	0.83	12.8
Nuke	43	42%	0.78	12.2
Dust2	36	47%	0.89	13.1
Overpass	16	75%	1.16	15.3
Cache	11	64%	0.93	14.6
Anubis	11	82%	0.97	12.8
Inferno	5	40%	0.90	15.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.8%Spray accuracy

74.9%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

582msReaction time

28.5%T opening success

44.2%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

7.56HE damage / grenade

8.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.4137% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4939% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	0.19	24%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.08	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	31%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	15%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	15%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	8%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.05	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	10%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.09	22%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	15%	3 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	11%	3 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.08	10%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.04	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	10%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	11%	2 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.04	21%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	12%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	7%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	18%	27 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	16%	26 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.05	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	6%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.15	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	11%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.03	5%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.10	3%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	9%	23 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	12%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	13%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	9%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.05	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	15%	15 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	20%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	22%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	12%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	12%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.10	15%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	7%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	6%	14 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	24%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	22%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	17%	8 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	23%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	10%	7 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.07	7%	5 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	0%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	25%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	18%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	13%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.02	5%	2 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	19%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	22%	28 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	18%	27 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.00	13%	27 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	14%	27 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	9%	24 May →
dust2	16–14	-0.09	12%	24 May →
overpass	13–6	0.05	22%	13 May →
cache	3–13	-0.07	33%	13 May →
cache	13–2	0.06	23%	6 May →
mirage	13–10	0.04	13%	6 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	14%	5 May →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	20%	5 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	10%	5 May →
inferno	12–12	0.07	9%	27 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.07	21%	26 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	15%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.08	9%	20 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.09	20%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.04	15%	20 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.02	19%	16 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.05	25%	16 Apr →
overpass	4–11	-0.02	26%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	23%	13 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.03	18%	13 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	34%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.09	25%	12 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.03	21%	12 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.03	15%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.07	20%	12 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	18%	12 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	10%	7 Apr →
nuke	12–12	0.01	19%	7 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.09	22%	6 Apr →
mirage	4–0	0.21	18%	5 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.00	14%	5 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	32%	5 Apr →
overpass	13–1	0.01	12%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.02	16%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–1	0.16	24%	5 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	21%	26 Mar →