J1BT — CS2 Stats

76561198208074847[U:1:247809119]

3,083Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,418Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5860 of 26439 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJ1BTFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,418 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55441Last 10055%Win rateLWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression9.0
Utility5.8
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time500ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–6
130Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2012860%0.02
mirageB168850%0.02
infernoA138562%0.01
vertigoA127558%0.00
cacheS128467%-0.00
anubisB105550%0.00
nukeB84450%-0.02
dust242250%0.01
eldorado21150%0.08
debris2020%-0.06
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,381Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
81.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4459%1.3318.0
Ancient3746%1.1316.5
Vertigo2357%1.1517.5
Anubis2245%1.3017.4
Nuke2065%1.2915.7
Inferno2060%1.2417.8
Overpass1155%1.0416.6
Cache771%0.6911.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
494msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
12.80HE damage / grenade
10.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–19-0.0016%28 Aug
vertigo13–90.0227%28 Aug
ancient13–80.0518%28 Aug
ancient13–8-0.037%28 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0610%27 Aug
vertigo19–15-0.0423%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0211%27 Aug
ancient13–90.019%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0638%26 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0627%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0413%24 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0319%23 Aug
vertigo7–130.0432%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.016%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0213%20 Aug
train3–13-0.0116%16 Aug
anubis4–130.0225%15 Aug
cache8–130.0611%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0413%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0412%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0414%14 Aug
anubis13–110.0212%14 Aug
ancient13–80.013%13 Aug
ancient12–120.0714%12 Aug
mirage5–130.0312%12 Aug
dust213–60.0512%12 Aug
cache13–110.0516%11 Aug
mirage2–130.0450%11 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0522%10 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0311%10 Aug
cache11–13-0.104%9 Aug
nuke13–8-0.064%9 Aug
vertigo16–190.0113%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0318%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0126%6 Aug
nuke13–20.0217%6 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0415%6 Aug
eldorado9–60.0835%6 Aug
debris4–9-0.0816%6 Aug
cache13–16-0.0316%6 Aug
vertigo19–16-0.037%5 Aug
vertigo13–70.0514%5 Aug
cache13–110.0116%5 Aug
vertigo13–110.0319%5 Aug
cache13–10-0.0313%5 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.058%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.048%4 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0314%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0116%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0313%3 Aug
vertigo13–20.0314%3 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.016%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0818%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0119%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0919%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0421%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.029%1 Aug
inferno13–9-0.007%1 Aug
inferno16–130.099%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.016%31 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0114%31 Jul
anubis13–90.048%30 Jul
cache13–80.0211%30 Jul
cache13–10-0.068%29 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0317%29 Jul
inferno13–110.0516%29 Jul
ancient13–70.0238%29 Jul
vertigo8–130.0118%23 Jul
anubis13–50.0213%23 Jul
anubis13–00.0716%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0119%21 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0215%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0419%21 Jul
mirage6–130.019%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0515%19 Jul
inferno13–70.1020%19 Jul
eldorado3–90.0711%19 Jul
debris3–9-0.036%19 Jul
cache11–130.0326%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0413%19 Jul
mirage6–130.018%18 Jul
inferno13–60.0516%17 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0711%17 Jul
ancient14–160.1012%17 Jul
inferno13–70.008%17 Jul
cache13–70.1115%17 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0116%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.037%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.045%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0614%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.070%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.079%16 Jul
dust213–70.037%16 Jul
ancient16–140.0114%14 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0620%14 Jul
mirage8–13-0.049%14 Jul
ancient13–60.1820%13 Jul
ancient0–10-0.004%13 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0520%12 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0213%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →