retro

retro — CS2 Stats

US76561198206711757[U:1:246446029]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,474Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,463Pink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4189 of 9707 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,763 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGretroFACEITLevel 9 · 1,763 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,463 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning43
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression5.0
Utility6.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time598ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–8
132Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%0.01
ancientB189950%-0.00
mirageB189950%-0.00
infernoA159660%-0.01
nukeB137654%0.02
anubisB115645%-0.01
cacheB63350%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

139Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
79.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4650%1.2217.1
Dust22148%1.1417.5
Anubis1947%1.1115.0
Inferno1963%1.3015.3
Ancient1338%1.1515.9
Nuke1258%1.0617.3
Vertigo540%1.3417.2
Overpass1100%1.0617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
599msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
14.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0414%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0219%26 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0116%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0121%25 Aug
inferno8–130.0322%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0316%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0620%24 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0210%21 Aug
nuke13–100.0212%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0014%17 Aug
inferno13–90.0119%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0024%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0419%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0618%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0918%14 Aug
anubis13–100.0610%13 Aug
dust213–110.0225%13 Aug
dust216–14-0.015%12 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0221%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.057%12 Aug
inferno15–150.027%11 Aug
ancient13–40.0821%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0710%11 Aug
dust23–13-0.0513%11 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0210%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0318%11 Aug
anubis16–12-0.035%9 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0818%8 Aug
cache13–110.0218%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0012%8 Aug
anubis13–40.0616%8 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0513%7 Aug
dust213–110.1017%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0817%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.0610%6 Aug
dust213–80.1120%5 Aug
nuke13–50.0414%4 Aug
cache13–90.0612%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0411%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0813%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.0419%3 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0125%3 Aug
dust213–90.0221%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0117%1 Aug
dust27–130.0313%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0718%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0111%31 Jul
ancient11–130.0125%31 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0520%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0515%29 Jul
dust24–130.0126%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0117%24 Jul
nuke10–130.0423%24 Jul
dust213–70.0116%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.039%24 Jul
nuke10–130.0821%23 Jul
cache1–13-0.0718%23 Jul
inferno13–110.019%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0320%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0514%23 Jul
cache2–13-0.0824%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0524%22 Jul
ancient10–130.0211%22 Jul
ancient0–13-0.070%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0419%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0911%21 Jul
dust213–90.0716%20 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0415%20 Jul
anubis16–140.0222%20 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0611%20 Jul
cache13–20.0411%18 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0118%18 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0612%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0319%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0319%18 Jul
mirage14–160.0223%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0422%17 Jul
dust213–90.0431%17 Jul
inferno13–20.0219%16 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0313%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0414%16 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0313%16 Jul
ancient13–50.0221%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.066%16 Jul
nuke15–15-0.027%16 Jul
nuke13–70.1118%14 Jul
dust213–70.0318%14 Jul
dust28–130.0310%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0513%14 Jul
ancient15–150.0720%13 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0224%13 Jul
mirage13–80.0526%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0318%10 Jul
inferno13–90.0619%10 Jul
ancient13–70.0726%10 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0123%10 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0117%10 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0211%10 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0318%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →