Tabby

Tabby — CS2 Stats

US76561198206331235[U:1:246065507]Steam profile ↗

990Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,412Pink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8346 of 20500 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 985 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTabbyFACEITLevel 7 · 985 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,412 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning47
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.9
Utility5.6
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.7
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time525ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27111641%0.00
mirageA2213959%0.00
infernoB147750%-0.00
cacheA116555%0.00
ancientS96367%-0.01
nukeD91811%-0.02
anubisA85363%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

347Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
85.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10854%1.1215.9
Dust29151%1.1115.6
Inferno4159%1.2618.6
Ancient3732%1.1116.0
Nuke3250%1.2618.6
Overpass1963%1.3715.0
Anubis1050%1.0217.1
Train729%1.0518.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
521msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
60.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
7.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4603% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0017%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0118%23 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0418%23 Aug
inferno9–130.0512%23 Aug
dust213–00.0028%23 Aug
anubis13–50.0817%23 Aug
dust211–130.1322%22 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0116%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.0218%20 Aug
inferno13–60.0525%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0320%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0415%17 Aug
inferno13–60.0817%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0519%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0521%16 Aug
cache10–130.0122%15 Aug
dust213–6-0.0415%15 Aug
cache13–80.0219%15 Aug
dust213–40.1121%15 Aug
mirage13–50.1519%15 Aug
dust26–130.0118%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0428%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0415%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0430%12 Aug
dust28–130.0026%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0315%12 Aug
cache5–130.0119%11 Aug
anubis3–13-0.086%11 Aug
anubis13–80.0210%10 Aug
dust210–130.0224%10 Aug
dust29–40.0613%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0021%8 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0616%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0317%8 Aug
mirage13–70.0222%8 Aug
dust213–20.0026%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0122%7 Aug
dust210–130.1116%7 Aug
cache13–5-0.0615%6 Aug
dust29–130.1018%6 Aug
dust212–120.0117%6 Aug
dust212–120.0117%6 Aug
cache10–13-0.0215%25 Jul
dust213–110.0015%25 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0115%25 Jul
anubis13–100.0015%25 Jul
mirage5–130.0018%22 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0711%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0115%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0310%19 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0522%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0119%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.009%19 Jul
dust213–80.0318%19 Jul
mirage3–80.0617%18 Jul
anubis10–130.0116%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0214%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0113%17 Jul
dust213–8-0.0525%17 Jul
inferno3–13-0.079%15 Jul
cache13–80.0221%14 Jul
anubis15–150.0319%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0116%14 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0412%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0017%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.1026%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0114%12 Jul
dust215–15-0.0614%12 Jul
anubis16–130.0014%12 Jul
inferno13–60.0411%12 Jul
dust213–4-0.0414%12 Jul
cache13–60.0719%12 Jul
inferno13–10.0817%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1213%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0513%11 Jul
mirage13–16-0.048%11 Jul
cache10–13-0.0122%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0620%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0317%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.0220%10 Jul
inferno13–80.0319%10 Jul
cache13–80.0020%8 Jul
mirage13–40.0311%8 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0013%6 Jul
ancient4–10-0.0018%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.029%4 Jul
dust213–9-0.0413%4 Jul
nuke13–70.0821%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0814%3 Jul
mirage13–100.0212%3 Jul
inferno16–130.0513%3 Jul
mirage13–100.0433%3 Jul
ancient13–90.0317%3 Jul
nuke8–130.0312%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0415%2 Jul
dust23–13-0.0119%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.072%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0529%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0613%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →