muuRq

muuRq — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198203201724[U:1:242935996]Steam profile ↗

1,173Tracked matches31%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,308Purple band · top ~27.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5172 of 7983 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

15,308Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,308
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,692 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmuuRqFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,308 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning47
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45478Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression5.8
Utility5.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 710ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time718ms+69ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 718ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 47% over 58mirageWeakest map · 39% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B58273147%0.05
mirageC28111739%0.01
ancient41325%-0.04
inferno31233%0.01
overpass330100%-0.02
train21150%-0.02
cache110100%-0.04
italy1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

210Matches
45%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
83.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6151%1.0614.6
Dust24245%1.2417.4
Ancient3342%0.9415.4
Anubis2548%1.0514.7
Inferno1839%0.9613.6
Nuke1030%0.9513.6
Vertigo540%0.8011.2
Train425%0.8114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
710msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
6.20HE damage / grenade
12.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.4165ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9067% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–20.1023%21 Jul
dust27–130.0114%21 Jul
dust24–13-0.0319%21 Jul
dust28–130.0323%19 Jun
dust213–80.1624%9 Jun
cache13–10-0.0410%16 May
dust24–130.0320%16 May
mirage4–13-0.0623%20 Apr
mirage0–90.0319%9 Mar
dust29–130.0523%9 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0518%20 Feb
dust213–90.1028%20 Feb
dust29–13-0.0412%19 Feb
mirage7–10-0.0118%15 Feb
dust29–130.0711%11 Feb
dust211–130.0812%4 Feb
dust26–13-0.049%22 Jan
mirage3–13-0.069%20 Jan
dust213–30.0827%20 Jan
dust29–130.1314%14 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0213%17 Dec
dust213–80.0020%17 Dec
dust212–120.0421%17 Dec
dust213–40.2518%16 Dec
dust212–120.0212%26 Nov
mirage12–120.1216%26 Nov
dust213–30.1220%26 Nov
dust212–120.0218%24 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0510%11 Nov
dust23–110.0011%11 Nov
dust211–10.085%26 Oct
dust212–120.0723%26 Oct
mirage13–90.0118%26 Oct
dust28–130.1012%26 Oct
dust213–50.0923%23 Oct
ancient13–11-0.0310%20 Oct
dust213–11-0.0016%20 Oct
dust213–80.1517%16 Oct
ancient2–13-0.0922%10 Oct
mirage13–3-0.0324%10 Oct
dust28–130.0215%10 Oct
dust28–130.1030%10 Oct
dust213–110.1720%7 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0513%3 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0216%3 Oct
dust213–50.0620%3 Oct
mirage8–130.0216%3 Oct
mirage13–80.0511%2 Oct
dust210–130.0223%2 Oct
dust213–80.0116%29 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0614%29 Sept
mirage13–8-0.059%24 Sept
dust210–13-0.0310%24 Sept
dust210–130.0721%23 Sept
dust23–13-0.0617%23 Sept
dust213–110.0923%22 Sept
mirage5–130.0316%19 Sept
mirage2–20.019%19 Sept
dust213–90.0212%19 Sept
train13–4-0.0518%19 Sept
dust213–20.0219%19 Sept
inferno13–20.0424%19 Sept
dust215–150.0318%17 Sept
mirage13–00.1524%17 Sept
dust213–100.1719%17 Sept
dust211–130.0926%17 Sept
train9–130.0118%12 Sept
dust213–80.0113%12 Sept
mirage8–130.069%10 Sept
dust213–100.1524%10 Sept
dust28–130.0814%10 Sept
dust28–130.0118%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0215%5 Sept
dust27–130.0130%5 Sept
dust213–110.0012%3 Sept
dust213–100.0915%3 Sept
dust213–9-0.0118%3 Sept
dust213–90.1219%26 Aug
dust23–130.0110%24 Aug
mirage1–70.0112%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0010%24 Aug
dust212–120.0513%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%24 Aug
ancient12–120.0116%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.0013%24 Aug
italy7–130.0710%24 Aug
dust213–2-0.0117%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0314%24 Aug
overpass13–3-0.0323%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.027%21 Aug
dust213–70.1111%21 Aug
mirage13–30.057%20 Aug
overpass12–1-0.0611%20 Aug
mirage10–130.059%19 Aug
dust213–60.1114%19 Aug
dust22–13-0.0623%19 Aug
dust210–10.0130%19 Aug
overpass13–90.038%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0511%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0611%13 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →