Violator (commend 4 commend)

Violator (commend 4 commend) — CS2 Stats

US76561198202271651[U:1:242005923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

447Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,893Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2790 of 16966 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGViolator (commend 4 comme…FACEITLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,893 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44533Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression3.7
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time617ms+53ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–7
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2391439%-0.01
mirageC2071335%0.01
anubisA148657%-0.01
infernoC145936%0.01
nukeB126650%-0.01
ancientB105550%-0.00
overpassB63350%0.01
train110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

314Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28149%1.0715.7
Mirage6248%1.0715.6
Inferno3644%1.1716.5
Anubis3158%1.1117.0
Ancient3037%1.0616.0
Nuke1947%1.0714.8
Overpass1164%1.5717.0
Train250%0.8117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
607msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.77HE damage / grenade
6.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0224%7 Apr
dust213–80.0313%7 Apr
mirage13–60.0614%6 Apr
anubis7–130.0224%5 Apr
inferno11–130.0216%5 Apr
inferno4–130.0431%5 Apr
dust28–13-0.1224%5 Apr
inferno8–130.0113%3 Apr
ancient13–90.0317%31 Mar
nuke8–130.0622%31 Mar
nuke7–13-0.039%31 Mar
inferno13–100.0512%31 Mar
dust213–40.0644%30 Mar
dust213–4-0.0721%30 Mar
overpass13–90.0427%30 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0229%30 Mar
dust213–40.0623%30 Mar
dust27–13-0.0531%30 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0323%29 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0716%28 Mar
dust22–13-0.0714%27 Mar
mirage9–130.0110%27 Mar
nuke13–40.0126%27 Mar
ancient13–8-0.089%27 Mar
ancient13–50.0221%27 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0829%26 Mar
mirage13–60.0514%26 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0321%26 Mar
anubis13–11-0.039%25 Mar
dust28–13-0.0244%24 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0223%24 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0127%23 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0327%23 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0414%23 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0329%23 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0114%22 Mar
anubis14–160.0013%22 Mar
dust25–13-0.1116%22 Mar
overpass13–11-0.029%22 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0018%20 Mar
mirage13–11-0.009%20 Mar
anubis16–130.0417%20 Mar
mirage7–130.0420%18 Mar
dust213–100.0218%17 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0122%17 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0411%16 Mar
dust22–130.0618%16 Mar
anubis6–130.0333%15 Mar
dust213–90.0325%15 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0117%15 Mar
dust29–13-0.0324%13 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0013%13 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0418%12 Mar
mirage10–130.0522%12 Mar
inferno11–10.0631%12 Mar
ancient13–70.1810%12 Mar
anubis19–17-0.037%10 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0721%10 Mar
inferno13–70.0025%10 Mar
overpass9–130.0922%10 Mar
mirage2–13-0.036%9 Mar
inferno11–130.0039%9 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0116%9 Mar
dust27–13-0.0127%8 Mar
mirage9–130.0115%8 Mar
overpass13–60.0610%8 Mar
ancient13–7-0.066%8 Mar
dust215–15-0.0416%8 Mar
dust27–13-0.0115%7 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0213%7 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0118%7 Mar
inferno13–50.1015%6 Mar
nuke13–100.0317%6 Mar
mirage10–130.1319%3 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0117%2 Mar
nuke4–130.0420%2 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0419%2 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0516%1 Mar
nuke13–6-0.068%23 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0418%23 Feb
dust216–120.0116%22 Feb
mirage13–60.0120%22 Feb
dust210–130.0019%22 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0617%21 Feb
anubis13–80.0210%21 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0410%20 Feb
dust213–110.0520%20 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0810%3 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0117%3 Feb
dust215–15-0.0124%3 Feb
train13–80.0526%2 Feb
inferno7–130.0513%2 Feb
dust213–20.0220%2 Feb
anubis13–110.0012%2 Feb
mirage13–50.017%2 Feb
mirage0–13-0.0913%2 Feb
dust28–13-0.0231%28 Jan
nuke13–60.0320%28 Jan
dust25–13-0.1122%28 Jan
ancient3–130.0032%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →