olavi

olavi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198201687123[U:1:241421395]Steam profile ↗

3,188Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,122Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13052 of 48827 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,417 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGolaviFACEITLevel 9 · 2,417 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,122 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning44
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4456Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.0
Aggression4.2
Utility7.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–6
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
616In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%0.02
ancientC1971237%0.01
nukeC1881044%0.01
infernoA138562%0.01
dust2D113827%0.00
anubisC104640%-0.02
cache42250%0.04
overpass31233%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,600Matches
49%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage35648%1.0815.6
Nuke18857%1.1315.7
Ancient15150%1.0915.2
Anubis14048%1.0616.6
Dust212947%1.0515.2
Overpass7254%1.1817.1
Inferno7148%1.0115.7
Vertigo3429%0.8814.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
602msReaction time
18.7%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
13.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.687% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0616%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0820%26 Aug
mirage13–50.0927%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.049%24 Aug
cache3–13-0.0122%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0618%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0818%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.078%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0216%16 Aug
nuke13–60.1616%14 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0620%11 Aug
ancient13–10.0426%11 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0238%11 Aug
cache14–160.0513%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0114%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0214%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0637%2 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0022%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0125%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0214%26 Jul
dust213–80.0019%25 Jul
cache13–20.0317%24 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0017%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0615%23 Jul
ancient11–130.0122%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0116%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0832%7 Jul
dust25–130.0116%30 Jun
ancient13–80.0220%28 Jun
nuke13–110.1221%26 Jun
nuke13–20.1322%26 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0524%25 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0219%14 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0342%13 Jun
mirage13–100.0955%7 Jun
inferno13–90.0627%7 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0419%7 Jun
dust213–80.0322%7 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0424%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0222%4 Jun
mirage13–80.0716%31 May
inferno7–130.0134%30 May
anubis11–13-0.0714%29 May
anubis16–13-0.0014%24 May
mirage10–13-0.0318%23 May
mirage13–80.0121%23 May
ancient4–13-0.0112%22 May
dust29–13-0.0517%22 May
ancient13–160.0415%2 May
anubis6–13-0.0621%2 May
ancient13–70.0320%2 May
cache13–40.0831%1 May
ancient13–7-0.0133%1 May
dust210–130.0120%11 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0717%10 Apr
ancient13–60.0222%24 Mar
ancient13–30.0522%24 Mar
mirage13–60.1625%24 Mar
mirage13–30.0218%23 Mar
ancient9–130.0123%23 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0333%22 Mar
mirage19–170.0621%22 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0333%22 Mar
ancient13–160.0624%19 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0525%17 Mar
nuke13–110.0227%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0033%14 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0218%14 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0520%12 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0128%12 Mar
mirage9–130.0119%11 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0325%14 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0219%13 Feb
inferno13–100.0919%2 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0217%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0118%1 Feb
inferno6–130.0439%27 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0218%27 Jan
mirage17–190.0424%4 Jan
ancient13–70.0630%28 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0138%22 Dec
overpass13–110.0041%21 Dec
overpass10–130.000%14 Dec
inferno9–6-0.0131%13 Dec
dust27–130.0747%12 Dec
mirage13–6-0.0020%12 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0535%12 Dec
dust210–130.0433%12 Dec
nuke8–130.0024%11 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0119%7 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0524%24 Nov
dust213–90.1022%24 Nov
inferno13–50.0423%23 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0524%21 Nov
nuke11–130.0238%21 Nov
dust22–8-0.1031%15 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0321%8 Nov
mirage12–160.0129%7 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0123%7 Nov
dust27–13-0.0026%7 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →