xX_TimmyGamez2016_Xx — CS2 Stats

76561198197492501[U:1:237226773]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,139Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,819Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5463 of 27716 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,868 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning61

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWLWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression8.1

Utility5.8

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning6.1

Utility5.8

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time506ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms

Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 42ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	42	29–13	69%	0.03
dust2	B	26	14–12	54%	0.00
inferno	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.02
ancient	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.02
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

468Matches

51%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

85.7ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	82	63%	1.17	16.4
Dust2	32	56%	1.07	15.5
Inferno	27	44%	1.06	17.7
Ancient	23	35%	0.93	15.7
Anubis	17	35%	1.01	15.3
Nuke	12	67%	0.77	13.4
Vertigo	12	33%	1.08	15.2
Overpass	8	62%	1.08	17.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy

33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

68.3%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

504msReaction time

34.0%T opening success

54.4%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

13.83HE damage / grenade

11.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4965 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.9644% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–3	0.11	24%	29 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	36%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	10%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.17	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	27%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	22%	26 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	10%	26 Aug →
vertigo	10–2	-0.00	25%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.00	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	34%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	33%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	17%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	22%	19 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	29%	19 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	26%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.08	10%	18 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.06	37%	18 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.05	22%	18 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	33%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	46%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	30%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	28%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	24%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.11	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	22%	5 Aug →
cache	2–5	-0.03	9%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	25%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.07	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.01	12%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	11%	31 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	0.07	40%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.05	10%	30 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	16%	28 Jul →
inferno	6–1	-0.15	0%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	2–0	0.00	0%	28 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.03	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.05	20%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.09	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.08	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	20%	24 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.05	7%	24 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.05	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.04	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	23%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	31%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.09	27%	15 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	10%	15 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.09	33%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	16%	13 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	16%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.11	22%	8 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	18%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	16%	8 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	25%	7 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	19%	6 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	24%	6 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	17%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	22%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.12	46%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.10	21%	2 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	21%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	16%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	23%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.10	30%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	21%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	17%	30 Jun →
mirage	4–2	0.06	7%	30 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	13%	30 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.03	18%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	30%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.19	40%	30 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.06	25%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.12	23%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.06	28%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	16%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	12%	27 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	21%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.01	14%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.05	24%	25 Jun →
ancient	12–12	-0.03	21%	24 Jun →