swb — CS2 Stats

76561198196770623[U:1:236504895]✓ No bans

339Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating16,609Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning53

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.0

Utility4.8

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning5.3

Utility4.8

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time563ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy18.4%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–0Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	16–16	50%	0.01
nuke	A	20	11–9	55%	0.03
dust2	D	14	3–11	21%	-0.02
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
poseidon	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	0.04
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.06
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
sanctum	—	1	1–0	100%	0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches

33%Win rate

0.74Avg K/D

63.6ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	2	50%	0.72	12.5
Ancient	2	0%	0.64	14.0
Mirage	1	100%	1.07	15.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.87	13.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.30	6.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.88	14.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.83	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy

38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

570msReaction time

24.0%T opening success

46.3%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

6.9%Flash assists

8.07HE damage / grenade

7.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.9844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–16	-0.05	11%	26 Aug →
mirage	6–1	0.03	25%	26 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
vertigo	3–9	-0.09	25%	26 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	22%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–12	-0.05	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	12%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	15%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	12%	20 Aug →
dust2	1–7	-0.05	25%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	11%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	18%	19 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.05	22%	16 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	17%	28 May →
dust2	10–13	0.10	19%	27 May →
mirage	15–15	0.03	29%	20 May →
ancient	3–0	-0.08	50%	20 May →
anubis	13–10	0.07	27%	20 May →
nuke	13–3	0.20	23%	20 May →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	17%	20 May →
ancient	13–9	0.12	21%	18 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	15%	18 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	18%	18 May →
cache	8–13	-0.04	14%	18 May →
nuke	13–5	0.14	32%	9 May →
dust2	13–8	0.04	22%	9 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	18%	8 May →
mirage	13–10	0.08	19%	8 May →
mirage	8–13	0.06	18%	25 Mar →
nuke	13–3	0.08	14%	25 Mar →
nuke	13–9	0.09	19%	24 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.09	23%	24 Mar →
poseidon	1–9	-0.23	17%	24 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	11%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.03	27%	20 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	15%	20 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	22%	17 Mar →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	23%	16 Mar →
overpass	7–13	0.05	18%	16 Mar →
mirage	8–13	0.02	29%	16 Mar →
overpass	11–13	0.06	22%	12 Mar →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	17%	7 Mar →
mirage	5–1	0.11	33%	7 Mar →
nuke	16–13	-0.04	20%	7 Mar →
poseidon	9–2	0.18	10%	7 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.02	20%	5 Mar →
ancient	16–14	0.01	20%	4 Mar →
inferno	9–1	0.28	14%	3 Mar →
nuke	9–7	0.09	14%	3 Mar →
poseidon	9–5	0.19	23%	3 Mar →
nuke	11–13	0.04	11%	26 Feb →
dust2	13–8	0.00	15%	26 Feb →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	5%	26 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	26%	26 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	19%	25 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	17%	23 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	12%	21 Feb →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	6%	21 Feb →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	20%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.06	17%	19 Feb →
anubis	12–16	0.03	13%	19 Feb →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	32%	19 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.06	12%	19 Feb →
sanctum	9–3	0.17	17%	13 Feb →
inferno	4–9	-0.14	13%	13 Feb →
poseidon	7–9	-0.05	28%	13 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.06	23%	13 Feb →
ancient	9–13	0.10	17%	13 Feb →
nuke	9–5	0.09	24%	13 Feb →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	13%	10 Feb →
mirage	16–13	0.08	17%	9 Feb →
ancient	16–13	0.04	11%	9 Feb →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	23%	9 Feb →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	16%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.00	18%	6 Feb →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	13%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.10	9%	5 Feb →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	3%	5 Feb →
mirage	3–7	-0.03	12%	5 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	20%	5 Feb →
inferno	15–15	0.05	17%	4 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.04	14%	25 Jan →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	15%	25 Jan →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	16%	15 Jan →
overpass	10–13	0.07	14%	14 Jan →
ancient	15–15	0.06	15%	13 Jan →
overpass	14–16	-0.01	16%	13 Jan →
nuke	13–3	-0.05	10%	13 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.07	26%	13 Jan →
ancient	13–6	0.09	13%	13 Jan →